Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events. / Beesley, T.; Pearson, D.; Le Pelley, M.
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 06.2015, p. 800-807.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Beesley, T, Pearson, D & Le Pelley, M 2015, 'Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 800-807. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

APA

Beesley, T., Pearson, D., & Le Pelley, M. (2015). Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(3), 800-807. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

Vancouver

Beesley T, Pearson D, Le Pelley M. Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2015 Jun;22(3):800-807. Epub 2014 Sept 24. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

Author

Beesley, T. ; Pearson, D. ; Le Pelley, M. / Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 800-807.

Bibtex

@article{2ba83a5554ae4ffebc9e9ab2969b23c8,
title = "Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events",
abstract = "In a novel implicit learning task, participants responded to a target stimulus that could appear in one of three locations. Unknown to participants, the location in which the target appeared was probabilistically determined on the basis of the location of eye-gaze immediately prior to the appearance of the target. Participants{\textquoteright} response times to the appearance of the target in a high-probability location were faster than when it appeared in a low-probability location, revealing that participants were able to learn these gaze-contingent events. Furthermore, there was no difference in the cuing score between those participants classified as aware or unaware of the contingencies on a subsequent forced-choice recognition task. These data suggest the task involves implicit learning of instrumental (action-outcome) contingencies, which has potential implications for our understanding of gaze-contingent processes in social interaction.",
keywords = "Implicit learning and memory , Eye movements and visual attention ",
author = "T. Beesley and D. Pearson and {Le Pelley}, M.",
note = "cited By 1",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
doi = "10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "800--807",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events

AU - Beesley, T.

AU - Pearson, D.

AU - Le Pelley, M.

N1 - cited By 1

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - In a novel implicit learning task, participants responded to a target stimulus that could appear in one of three locations. Unknown to participants, the location in which the target appeared was probabilistically determined on the basis of the location of eye-gaze immediately prior to the appearance of the target. Participants’ response times to the appearance of the target in a high-probability location were faster than when it appeared in a low-probability location, revealing that participants were able to learn these gaze-contingent events. Furthermore, there was no difference in the cuing score between those participants classified as aware or unaware of the contingencies on a subsequent forced-choice recognition task. These data suggest the task involves implicit learning of instrumental (action-outcome) contingencies, which has potential implications for our understanding of gaze-contingent processes in social interaction.

AB - In a novel implicit learning task, participants responded to a target stimulus that could appear in one of three locations. Unknown to participants, the location in which the target appeared was probabilistically determined on the basis of the location of eye-gaze immediately prior to the appearance of the target. Participants’ response times to the appearance of the target in a high-probability location were faster than when it appeared in a low-probability location, revealing that participants were able to learn these gaze-contingent events. Furthermore, there was no difference in the cuing score between those participants classified as aware or unaware of the contingencies on a subsequent forced-choice recognition task. These data suggest the task involves implicit learning of instrumental (action-outcome) contingencies, which has potential implications for our understanding of gaze-contingent processes in social interaction.

KW - Implicit learning and memory

KW - Eye movements and visual attention

U2 - 10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

DO - 10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 800

EP - 807

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -