Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Improving Quality of Care through Routine, Succ...
View graph of relations

Improving Quality of Care through Routine, Successful Implementation of Evidence-based Practice at the Bedside: Organizational Case Study Protocol Using the Pettigrew and Whipp Model of Strategic Change

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Improving Quality of Care through Routine, Successful Implementation of Evidence-based Practice at the Bedside: Organizational Case Study Protocol Using the Pettigrew and Whipp Model of Strategic Change. / Stetler, C.B.; Ritchie, J.; Rycroft-Malone, J. et al.
In: Implementation Science, Vol. 2, 3, 01.01.2007.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{84446f9d0d554bb58fa12c76dab23a3b,
title = "Improving Quality of Care through Routine, Successful Implementation of Evidence-based Practice at the Bedside: Organizational Case Study Protocol Using the Pettigrew and Whipp Model of Strategic Change",
abstract = "BackgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is an expected approach to improving the quality of patient care and service delivery in health care systems internationally that is yet to be realized. Given the current evidence-practice gap, numerous authors describe barriers to achieving EBP. One recurrently identified barrier is the setting or context of practice, which is likewise cited as a potential part of the solution to the gap. The purpose of this study is to identify key contextual elements and related strategic processes in organizations that find and use evidence at multiple levels, in an ongoing, integrated fashion, in contrast to those that do not.MethodsThe core theoretical framework for this multi-method explanatory case study is Pettigrew and Whipp's Content, Context, and Process model of strategic change. This framework focuses data collection on three entities: the Why of strategic change, the What of strategic change, and the How of strategic change, in this case related to implementation and normalization of EBP. The data collection plan, designed to capture relevant organizational context and related outcomes, focuses on eight interrelated factors said to characterize a receptive context. Selective, purposive sampling will provide contrasting results between two cases (departments of nursing) and three embedded units in each. Data collection methods will include quantitative tools (e.g., regarding culture) and qualitative approaches including focus groups, interviews, and documents review (e.g., regarding integration and “success”) relevant to the EBP initiative.DiscussionThis study should provide information regarding contextual elements and related strategic processes key to successful implementation and sustainability of EBP, specifically in terms of a pervasive pattern in an acute care hospital-based health care setting. Additionally, this study will identify key contextual elements that differentiate successful implementation and sustainability of EBP efforts, both within varying levels of a hospital-based clinical setting and across similar hospital settings interested in EBP.",
keywords = "HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES, HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES",
author = "C.B. Stetler and J. Ritchie and J. Rycroft-Malone and A. Achults and M. Charns",
year = "2007",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-2-3",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving Quality of Care through Routine, Successful Implementation of Evidence-based Practice at the Bedside

T2 - Organizational Case Study Protocol Using the Pettigrew and Whipp Model of Strategic Change

AU - Stetler, C.B.

AU - Ritchie, J.

AU - Rycroft-Malone, J.

AU - Achults, A.

AU - Charns, M.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - BackgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is an expected approach to improving the quality of patient care and service delivery in health care systems internationally that is yet to be realized. Given the current evidence-practice gap, numerous authors describe barriers to achieving EBP. One recurrently identified barrier is the setting or context of practice, which is likewise cited as a potential part of the solution to the gap. The purpose of this study is to identify key contextual elements and related strategic processes in organizations that find and use evidence at multiple levels, in an ongoing, integrated fashion, in contrast to those that do not.MethodsThe core theoretical framework for this multi-method explanatory case study is Pettigrew and Whipp's Content, Context, and Process model of strategic change. This framework focuses data collection on three entities: the Why of strategic change, the What of strategic change, and the How of strategic change, in this case related to implementation and normalization of EBP. The data collection plan, designed to capture relevant organizational context and related outcomes, focuses on eight interrelated factors said to characterize a receptive context. Selective, purposive sampling will provide contrasting results between two cases (departments of nursing) and three embedded units in each. Data collection methods will include quantitative tools (e.g., regarding culture) and qualitative approaches including focus groups, interviews, and documents review (e.g., regarding integration and “success”) relevant to the EBP initiative.DiscussionThis study should provide information regarding contextual elements and related strategic processes key to successful implementation and sustainability of EBP, specifically in terms of a pervasive pattern in an acute care hospital-based health care setting. Additionally, this study will identify key contextual elements that differentiate successful implementation and sustainability of EBP efforts, both within varying levels of a hospital-based clinical setting and across similar hospital settings interested in EBP.

AB - BackgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is an expected approach to improving the quality of patient care and service delivery in health care systems internationally that is yet to be realized. Given the current evidence-practice gap, numerous authors describe barriers to achieving EBP. One recurrently identified barrier is the setting or context of practice, which is likewise cited as a potential part of the solution to the gap. The purpose of this study is to identify key contextual elements and related strategic processes in organizations that find and use evidence at multiple levels, in an ongoing, integrated fashion, in contrast to those that do not.MethodsThe core theoretical framework for this multi-method explanatory case study is Pettigrew and Whipp's Content, Context, and Process model of strategic change. This framework focuses data collection on three entities: the Why of strategic change, the What of strategic change, and the How of strategic change, in this case related to implementation and normalization of EBP. The data collection plan, designed to capture relevant organizational context and related outcomes, focuses on eight interrelated factors said to characterize a receptive context. Selective, purposive sampling will provide contrasting results between two cases (departments of nursing) and three embedded units in each. Data collection methods will include quantitative tools (e.g., regarding culture) and qualitative approaches including focus groups, interviews, and documents review (e.g., regarding integration and “success”) relevant to the EBP initiative.DiscussionThis study should provide information regarding contextual elements and related strategic processes key to successful implementation and sustainability of EBP, specifically in terms of a pervasive pattern in an acute care hospital-based health care setting. Additionally, this study will identify key contextual elements that differentiate successful implementation and sustainability of EBP efforts, both within varying levels of a hospital-based clinical setting and across similar hospital settings interested in EBP.

KW - HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

KW - HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-2-3

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-2-3

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 3

ER -