Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Impulse turbine injector design improvement usi...

Associated organisational units

View graph of relations

Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics. / Benzon, David; Zidonis, Audrius; Panagiotopoulos, Alexandros et al.
In: Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 4, 041106, 01.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Benzon, D, Zidonis, A, Panagiotopoulos, A, Aggidis, G, Anagnostopoulos, J & Papantonis, D 2015, 'Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics', Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 137, no. 4, 041106. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029310

APA

Benzon, D., Zidonis, A., Panagiotopoulos, A., Aggidis, G., Anagnostopoulos, J., & Papantonis, D. (2015). Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 137(4), Article 041106. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029310

Vancouver

Benzon D, Zidonis A, Panagiotopoulos A, Aggidis G, Anagnostopoulos J, Papantonis D. Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2015 Apr 1;137(4):041106. Epub 2015 Jan 20. doi: 10.1115/1.4029310

Author

Benzon, David ; Zidonis, Audrius ; Panagiotopoulos, Alexandros et al. / Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics. In: Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 137, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{69f0e2fb423140ccbcd16024e2bc00fa,
title = "Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics",
abstract = "This study utilises two modern CFD software packages (ANSYS¯ CFX¯ and ANSYS¯ Fluent¯) to analyse the basic geometric factors affecting the efficiency of a typical impulse turbine injector. A Design of Experiments study is used to look at the impact of four primary nozzle and spear design parameters on the injector losses over a range of inlet pressures. Improved injector designs for both solvers are suggested based on the results and comparisons are made. The results for both CFD tools suggest that steeper injector nozzle and spear angles than current literature describes will reduce the losses by up to 0.6%.",
author = "David Benzon and Audrius Zidonis and Alexandros Panagiotopoulos and George Aggidis and John Anagnostopoulos and Dimitrios Papantonis",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4029310",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
journal = "Journal of Fluids Engineering",
issn = "0098-2202",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impulse turbine injector design improvement using Computational Fluid Dynamics

AU - Benzon, David

AU - Zidonis, Audrius

AU - Panagiotopoulos, Alexandros

AU - Aggidis, George

AU - Anagnostopoulos, John

AU - Papantonis, Dimitrios

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - This study utilises two modern CFD software packages (ANSYS¯ CFX¯ and ANSYS¯ Fluent¯) to analyse the basic geometric factors affecting the efficiency of a typical impulse turbine injector. A Design of Experiments study is used to look at the impact of four primary nozzle and spear design parameters on the injector losses over a range of inlet pressures. Improved injector designs for both solvers are suggested based on the results and comparisons are made. The results for both CFD tools suggest that steeper injector nozzle and spear angles than current literature describes will reduce the losses by up to 0.6%.

AB - This study utilises two modern CFD software packages (ANSYS¯ CFX¯ and ANSYS¯ Fluent¯) to analyse the basic geometric factors affecting the efficiency of a typical impulse turbine injector. A Design of Experiments study is used to look at the impact of four primary nozzle and spear design parameters on the injector losses over a range of inlet pressures. Improved injector designs for both solvers are suggested based on the results and comparisons are made. The results for both CFD tools suggest that steeper injector nozzle and spear angles than current literature describes will reduce the losses by up to 0.6%.

U2 - 10.1115/1.4029310

DO - 10.1115/1.4029310

M3 - Journal article

VL - 137

JO - Journal of Fluids Engineering

JF - Journal of Fluids Engineering

SN - 0098-2202

IS - 4

M1 - 041106

ER -