Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - In All Likelihoods
T2 - Robust Selection of Pseudo-Labeled Data
AU - Rodemann, Julian
AU - Jansen, Christoph
AU - Schollmeyer, Georg
AU - Augustin, Thomas
PY - 2023/7/14
Y1 - 2023/7/14
N2 - Self-training is a simple yet effective method within semi-supervised learning. Self-training’s rationale is to iteratively enhance training data by adding pseudo-labeled data. Its generalization performance heavily depends on the selection of these pseudo-labeled data (PLS). In this paper, we render PLS more robust towards the involved modeling assumptions. To this end, we treat PLS as a decision problem, which allows us to introduce a generalized utility function. The idea is to select pseudo-labeled data that maximize a multi-objective utility function. We demonstrate that the latter can be constructed to account for different sources of uncertainty and explore three examples: model selection, accumulation of errors and covariate shift. In the absence of second-order information on such uncertainties, we furthermore consider the generic approach of the generalized Bayesian α-cut updating rule for credal sets. We spotlight the application of three of our robust extensions on both simulated and three real-world data sets. In a benchmarking study, we compare these extensions to traditional PLS methods. Results suggest that robustness with regard to model choice can lead to substantial accuracy gains.
AB - Self-training is a simple yet effective method within semi-supervised learning. Self-training’s rationale is to iteratively enhance training data by adding pseudo-labeled data. Its generalization performance heavily depends on the selection of these pseudo-labeled data (PLS). In this paper, we render PLS more robust towards the involved modeling assumptions. To this end, we treat PLS as a decision problem, which allows us to introduce a generalized utility function. The idea is to select pseudo-labeled data that maximize a multi-objective utility function. We demonstrate that the latter can be constructed to account for different sources of uncertainty and explore three examples: model selection, accumulation of errors and covariate shift. In the absence of second-order information on such uncertainties, we furthermore consider the generic approach of the generalized Bayesian α-cut updating rule for credal sets. We spotlight the application of three of our robust extensions on both simulated and three real-world data sets. In a benchmarking study, we compare these extensions to traditional PLS methods. Results suggest that robustness with regard to model choice can lead to substantial accuracy gains.
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
T3 - PMLR
SP - 412
EP - 425
BT - Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities: Theories and Applications (ISIPTA '23)
PB - PMLR
ER -