Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > In the Antechamber of Power

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

In the Antechamber of Power: Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

In the Antechamber of Power: Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt. / Bradley, A.
In: Political Theology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 28.02.2023, p. 98-114.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bradley A. In the Antechamber of Power: Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt. Political Theology. 2023 Feb 28;24(1):98-114. Epub 2022 Jul 29. doi: 10.1080/1462317X.2022.2105279

Author

Bradley, A. / In the Antechamber of Power : Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt. In: Political Theology. 2023 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 98-114.

Bibtex

@article{f1d34222bcf446a1b5bb7c6c0d019145,
title = "In the Antechamber of Power: Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt",
abstract = "In this article, I offer an architectonic of what Carl Schmitt calls the “antechamber of power from Friedrich Schiller, through Franz Kafka, to Walter Benjamin. To summarize my argument, I contend that the “antechamber of power” may always have been a supplementary space within the conceptual imaginary of sovereignty, but Schiller, Kafka, Benjamin, and Schmitt re-imagine it as the privileged space of an originary partage, sharing or division of power. If Jean Bodin defines sovereign power as “indivisible,” I instead trace the self-division of sovereignty into what Jacques Derrida famously calls “plus d{\textquoteright}un” places of power. In a series of readings of philosophical, historical, and literary representations of the antechamber, I show how the allegedly private chamber of power occupied by the sovereign alone constitutively divides or itself into a series of new political antechambers occupied by a new class of political bodies: Schiller{\textquoteright}s counsellor, Kafka{\textquoteright}s bureaucrat, Benjamin{\textquoteright}s clerk.",
keywords = "Antechamber, schiller, kafka, benjamin, schmitt, Dante, Sovereignty",
author = "A. Bradley",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/1462317X.2022.2105279",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "98--114",
journal = "Political Theology",
issn = "1462-317X",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the Antechamber of Power

T2 - Sovereign Divisibility from Schiller to Schmitt

AU - Bradley, A.

PY - 2023/2/28

Y1 - 2023/2/28

N2 - In this article, I offer an architectonic of what Carl Schmitt calls the “antechamber of power from Friedrich Schiller, through Franz Kafka, to Walter Benjamin. To summarize my argument, I contend that the “antechamber of power” may always have been a supplementary space within the conceptual imaginary of sovereignty, but Schiller, Kafka, Benjamin, and Schmitt re-imagine it as the privileged space of an originary partage, sharing or division of power. If Jean Bodin defines sovereign power as “indivisible,” I instead trace the self-division of sovereignty into what Jacques Derrida famously calls “plus d’un” places of power. In a series of readings of philosophical, historical, and literary representations of the antechamber, I show how the allegedly private chamber of power occupied by the sovereign alone constitutively divides or itself into a series of new political antechambers occupied by a new class of political bodies: Schiller’s counsellor, Kafka’s bureaucrat, Benjamin’s clerk.

AB - In this article, I offer an architectonic of what Carl Schmitt calls the “antechamber of power from Friedrich Schiller, through Franz Kafka, to Walter Benjamin. To summarize my argument, I contend that the “antechamber of power” may always have been a supplementary space within the conceptual imaginary of sovereignty, but Schiller, Kafka, Benjamin, and Schmitt re-imagine it as the privileged space of an originary partage, sharing or division of power. If Jean Bodin defines sovereign power as “indivisible,” I instead trace the self-division of sovereignty into what Jacques Derrida famously calls “plus d’un” places of power. In a series of readings of philosophical, historical, and literary representations of the antechamber, I show how the allegedly private chamber of power occupied by the sovereign alone constitutively divides or itself into a series of new political antechambers occupied by a new class of political bodies: Schiller’s counsellor, Kafka’s bureaucrat, Benjamin’s clerk.

KW - Antechamber

KW - schiller

KW - kafka

KW - benjamin

KW - schmitt

KW - Dante

KW - Sovereignty

U2 - 10.1080/1462317X.2022.2105279

DO - 10.1080/1462317X.2022.2105279

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 98

EP - 114

JO - Political Theology

JF - Political Theology

SN - 1462-317X

IS - 1

ER -