Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inclusive activity

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inclusive activity: The perceptions of disabled people and their influencers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Published

Standard

Inclusive activity: The perceptions of disabled people and their influencers. / Johnson, Elliott.
In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 15, No. s1, 17.10.2018, p. S100.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Johnson E. Inclusive activity: The perceptions of disabled people and their influencers. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2018 Oct 17;15(s1):S100. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0535

Author

Johnson, Elliott. / Inclusive activity : The perceptions of disabled people and their influencers. In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. s1. pp. S100.

Bibtex

@article{234bfc534f9346fdb3021b10f405a61d,
title = "Inclusive activity: The perceptions of disabled people and their influencers",
abstract = "Introduction: EFDS has undertaken studies into the perceptions of four groups that influence physical activity among disabled people: their supporters, non-disabled peers, activity deliverers and disabled people themselves. We are now able to present a 360° perspective, particularly with reference to inclusive sport (disabled and non-disabled people participating together).Method: EFDS has commissioned a number of mixed-methods studies, including qualitative depth interviews, focus groups and exposure sessions as well as large-scale quantitative surveys.Results:• Disabled people cite psychological barriers – including personal perceptions and those of others – as the greatest challenge to participation, with physical and logistical barriers also apparent• 89% of disabled people{\textquoteright}s supporters say they have some influence on disabled people{\textquoteright}s activity. 68% think disabled people they support would like to be more active but too many practical and emotional barriers exist• 14% of non-disabled people are aware of having taken part in sport with disabled people. 67% had no prior knowledge of what the term {\textquoteleft}inclusive sport{\textquoteright} means but 73% are open to taking part with disabled people• 77% of activity deliverers have no experience of providing for disabled people, leading to low confidence and interest in such delivery. Many do not understand what the term {\textquoteleft}inclusive activity{\textquoteright} means but fear the concept might negatively impact non-disabled peopleConclusion: A lack of experience of inclusive activity and resulting psychological barriers are prevalent among those with influence on disabled people{\textquoteright}s activity levels. An across-the-board approach is essential in increasing participation and improving health and wellbeing.External funding details: Sport England and SOGB/Mencap.",
keywords = "Disability, Disabled people, Inclusion, Accessibility, Physical activity, Sport, Delivery, Perceptions",
author = "Elliott Johnson",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1123/jpah.2018-0535",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "S100",
journal = "Journal of Physical Activity and Health",
issn = "1543-3080",
publisher = "HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC",
number = "s1",
note = "International Society for Physical Activity and Health (ISPAH) Congress : London 2018, ISPAH Congress 2018 ; Conference date: 15-10-2018 Through 17-10-2018",
url = "https://www.ispah.org/congress-history/london-2018/",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusive activity

T2 - International Society for Physical Activity and Health (ISPAH) Congress

AU - Johnson, Elliott

PY - 2018/10/17

Y1 - 2018/10/17

N2 - Introduction: EFDS has undertaken studies into the perceptions of four groups that influence physical activity among disabled people: their supporters, non-disabled peers, activity deliverers and disabled people themselves. We are now able to present a 360° perspective, particularly with reference to inclusive sport (disabled and non-disabled people participating together).Method: EFDS has commissioned a number of mixed-methods studies, including qualitative depth interviews, focus groups and exposure sessions as well as large-scale quantitative surveys.Results:• Disabled people cite psychological barriers – including personal perceptions and those of others – as the greatest challenge to participation, with physical and logistical barriers also apparent• 89% of disabled people’s supporters say they have some influence on disabled people’s activity. 68% think disabled people they support would like to be more active but too many practical and emotional barriers exist• 14% of non-disabled people are aware of having taken part in sport with disabled people. 67% had no prior knowledge of what the term ‘inclusive sport’ means but 73% are open to taking part with disabled people• 77% of activity deliverers have no experience of providing for disabled people, leading to low confidence and interest in such delivery. Many do not understand what the term ‘inclusive activity’ means but fear the concept might negatively impact non-disabled peopleConclusion: A lack of experience of inclusive activity and resulting psychological barriers are prevalent among those with influence on disabled people’s activity levels. An across-the-board approach is essential in increasing participation and improving health and wellbeing.External funding details: Sport England and SOGB/Mencap.

AB - Introduction: EFDS has undertaken studies into the perceptions of four groups that influence physical activity among disabled people: their supporters, non-disabled peers, activity deliverers and disabled people themselves. We are now able to present a 360° perspective, particularly with reference to inclusive sport (disabled and non-disabled people participating together).Method: EFDS has commissioned a number of mixed-methods studies, including qualitative depth interviews, focus groups and exposure sessions as well as large-scale quantitative surveys.Results:• Disabled people cite psychological barriers – including personal perceptions and those of others – as the greatest challenge to participation, with physical and logistical barriers also apparent• 89% of disabled people’s supporters say they have some influence on disabled people’s activity. 68% think disabled people they support would like to be more active but too many practical and emotional barriers exist• 14% of non-disabled people are aware of having taken part in sport with disabled people. 67% had no prior knowledge of what the term ‘inclusive sport’ means but 73% are open to taking part with disabled people• 77% of activity deliverers have no experience of providing for disabled people, leading to low confidence and interest in such delivery. Many do not understand what the term ‘inclusive activity’ means but fear the concept might negatively impact non-disabled peopleConclusion: A lack of experience of inclusive activity and resulting psychological barriers are prevalent among those with influence on disabled people’s activity levels. An across-the-board approach is essential in increasing participation and improving health and wellbeing.External funding details: Sport England and SOGB/Mencap.

KW - Disability

KW - Disabled people

KW - Inclusion

KW - Accessibility

KW - Physical activity

KW - Sport

KW - Delivery

KW - Perceptions

U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2018-0535

DO - 10.1123/jpah.2018-0535

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 15

SP - S100

JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

SN - 1543-3080

IS - s1

Y2 - 15 October 2018 through 17 October 2018

ER -