Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Incomplete information, proportional representa...

Electronic data

  • resubmit_SCWR2_250816

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7

    Accepted author manuscript, 404 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting. / Troumpounis, Orestis; Xefteris, Dimitrios.
In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 47, No. 4, 12.2016, p. 879-903.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Troumpounis O, Xefteris D. Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting. Social Choice and Welfare. 2016 Dec;47(4):879-903. Epub 2016 Sept 27. doi: 10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7

Author

Troumpounis, Orestis ; Xefteris, Dimitrios. / Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting. In: Social Choice and Welfare. 2016 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 879-903.

Bibtex

@article{e989550538fa460886f1c94fcb263df8,
title = "Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting",
abstract = "We introduce incomplete information to a multiparty election under proportional representation: each voter knows her preferences and votes strategically to maximize her payoffs, but is uncertain about the number and the preferences of the other voters. Parties are assumed to be purely office motivated and, hence, the resulting governments are always minimum winning. In this framework we prove a) generic existence of equilibria where only two parties receive a positive fraction of the votes and therefore lead to single-party governments and b) generic inexistence of equilibria that lead to coalition governments. That is, contrary to common wisdom, a proportional rule is found not to promote sincere voting and to be favorable towards single-party governments. The existence of two-party equilibria that lead to single-party governments is robust to parties having ideological concerns.",
keywords = "Proportional Elections, Strategic Voters, Incomplete Information, Duverger{\textquoteright}s Hypothesis, Poisson Games, Gamson{\textquoteright}s Law",
author = "Orestis Troumpounis and Dimitrios Xefteris",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "879--903",
journal = "Social Choice and Welfare",
issn = "0176-1714",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag,",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting

AU - Troumpounis, Orestis

AU - Xefteris, Dimitrios

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - We introduce incomplete information to a multiparty election under proportional representation: each voter knows her preferences and votes strategically to maximize her payoffs, but is uncertain about the number and the preferences of the other voters. Parties are assumed to be purely office motivated and, hence, the resulting governments are always minimum winning. In this framework we prove a) generic existence of equilibria where only two parties receive a positive fraction of the votes and therefore lead to single-party governments and b) generic inexistence of equilibria that lead to coalition governments. That is, contrary to common wisdom, a proportional rule is found not to promote sincere voting and to be favorable towards single-party governments. The existence of two-party equilibria that lead to single-party governments is robust to parties having ideological concerns.

AB - We introduce incomplete information to a multiparty election under proportional representation: each voter knows her preferences and votes strategically to maximize her payoffs, but is uncertain about the number and the preferences of the other voters. Parties are assumed to be purely office motivated and, hence, the resulting governments are always minimum winning. In this framework we prove a) generic existence of equilibria where only two parties receive a positive fraction of the votes and therefore lead to single-party governments and b) generic inexistence of equilibria that lead to coalition governments. That is, contrary to common wisdom, a proportional rule is found not to promote sincere voting and to be favorable towards single-party governments. The existence of two-party equilibria that lead to single-party governments is robust to parties having ideological concerns.

KW - Proportional Elections

KW - Strategic Voters

KW - Incomplete Information

KW - Duverger’s Hypothesis

KW - Poisson Games

KW - Gamson’s Law

U2 - 10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7

DO - 10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 879

EP - 903

JO - Social Choice and Welfare

JF - Social Choice and Welfare

SN - 0176-1714

IS - 4

ER -