Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > India's fractured Northeastern frontier
View graph of relations

India's fractured Northeastern frontier: an overview

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

India's fractured Northeastern frontier : an overview. / Mukherjee, Kunal.

In: Asia Pacific Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 10.2014, p. 149-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Mukherjee, Kunal. / India's fractured Northeastern frontier : an overview. In: Asia Pacific Review. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 149-171.

Bibtex

@article{562a055535c24a668c7291e0ff59ea7b,
title = "India's fractured Northeastern frontier: an overview",
abstract = "The paper tries to analyze the different layers of the conflict in the remote Indian northeast. It looks at the different facets of this conflict, and argues that the conflict in the Indian northeast exists at many different levels. In relation to the different facets of the conflict, the paper has a special focus on human rights abuses, poverty, corruption, poor governance, administrative failure, the role played by external actors, and draconian laws such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Most of the conflicts have been associated with strong separatist tendencies and the issue of migration. The levels of violence have differed from place to place within the region. While violence has been successfully dealt with by the Indian government in states like Mizoram, the situation in states like Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland seems to be a work in progress. Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland have witnessed very high levels of violence since 1947, when India became independent from British colonial rule, until the present day. Methodologically, the paper follows a bottom up approach, and, to get first-hand information about the conflict, a series of interviews was conducted recently with some of the local residents of the region. The paper suggests demilitarization and infrastructure development in the region as the way forward.",
author = "Kunal Mukherjee",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1080/13439006.2014.968971",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "149--171",
journal = "Asia Pacific Review",
issn = "1343-9006",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - India's fractured Northeastern frontier

T2 - an overview

AU - Mukherjee, Kunal

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - The paper tries to analyze the different layers of the conflict in the remote Indian northeast. It looks at the different facets of this conflict, and argues that the conflict in the Indian northeast exists at many different levels. In relation to the different facets of the conflict, the paper has a special focus on human rights abuses, poverty, corruption, poor governance, administrative failure, the role played by external actors, and draconian laws such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Most of the conflicts have been associated with strong separatist tendencies and the issue of migration. The levels of violence have differed from place to place within the region. While violence has been successfully dealt with by the Indian government in states like Mizoram, the situation in states like Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland seems to be a work in progress. Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland have witnessed very high levels of violence since 1947, when India became independent from British colonial rule, until the present day. Methodologically, the paper follows a bottom up approach, and, to get first-hand information about the conflict, a series of interviews was conducted recently with some of the local residents of the region. The paper suggests demilitarization and infrastructure development in the region as the way forward.

AB - The paper tries to analyze the different layers of the conflict in the remote Indian northeast. It looks at the different facets of this conflict, and argues that the conflict in the Indian northeast exists at many different levels. In relation to the different facets of the conflict, the paper has a special focus on human rights abuses, poverty, corruption, poor governance, administrative failure, the role played by external actors, and draconian laws such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Most of the conflicts have been associated with strong separatist tendencies and the issue of migration. The levels of violence have differed from place to place within the region. While violence has been successfully dealt with by the Indian government in states like Mizoram, the situation in states like Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland seems to be a work in progress. Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland have witnessed very high levels of violence since 1947, when India became independent from British colonial rule, until the present day. Methodologically, the paper follows a bottom up approach, and, to get first-hand information about the conflict, a series of interviews was conducted recently with some of the local residents of the region. The paper suggests demilitarization and infrastructure development in the region as the way forward.

U2 - 10.1080/13439006.2014.968971

DO - 10.1080/13439006.2014.968971

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 149

EP - 171

JO - Asia Pacific Review

JF - Asia Pacific Review

SN - 1343-9006

IS - 2

ER -