Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the...

Research

Electronic data

Keywords

View graph of relations

Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau. / Fish, Adam.
In: Journal of Northwest Anthropology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2011, p. 91-114.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Fish, A 2011, 'Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau', Journal of Northwest Anthropology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 91-114.

APA

Fish, A. (2011). Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau. Journal of Northwest Anthropology, 45(1), 91-114.

Vancouver

Fish A. Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau. Journal of Northwest Anthropology. 2011;45(1):91-114.

Author

Fish, Adam. / Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau. In: Journal of Northwest Anthropology. 2011 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 91-114.

Bibtex

@article{763d94ffbbc64b28a062bbc07599cfc6,
title = "Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau",
abstract = "Native American communities historically indigenous to the Columbia Plateau in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho use the internet in acts of historical representation. The internet provides to tribal people a medium through which to accurately represent issues of place, time, and performance. The internet, however, is changing, challenging some tribal representational practices. Participation with the internet is divided into two historical, technical, and cultural phases: Web 1.0 (1994–2004) and Web 2.0 (2005–today). The Web 1.0 sites discussed in this article include the Lifelong Learning modules of the Schitsu{\textquoteright}umsh (Coeur d{\textquoteright}Alene), the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (CTUIR), and the Nim{\'i}ipuu (Nez Perce Tribe). Explored are ways Web 1.0 features gave tribal people control over their official historiography, while new forms of collective or Web 2.0 internet authorship may be endangering officially sanctioned tribal histories. An example of Web 2.0, the Colville tribal social media site One Heart for the People is briefly mobilized to illustrate how Web 1.0 tribal historiography opposes theories of culture.",
keywords = "media, indigenous, ethnography, culture, internet, social media",
author = "Adam Fish",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "91--114",
journal = "Journal of Northwest Anthropology",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indigenous Digital Media and the History of the Internet on the Columbia Plateau

AU - Fish, Adam

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Native American communities historically indigenous to the Columbia Plateau in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho use the internet in acts of historical representation. The internet provides to tribal people a medium through which to accurately represent issues of place, time, and performance. The internet, however, is changing, challenging some tribal representational practices. Participation with the internet is divided into two historical, technical, and cultural phases: Web 1.0 (1994–2004) and Web 2.0 (2005–today). The Web 1.0 sites discussed in this article include the Lifelong Learning modules of the Schitsu’umsh (Coeur d’Alene), the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (CTUIR), and the Nimíipuu (Nez Perce Tribe). Explored are ways Web 1.0 features gave tribal people control over their official historiography, while new forms of collective or Web 2.0 internet authorship may be endangering officially sanctioned tribal histories. An example of Web 2.0, the Colville tribal social media site One Heart for the People is briefly mobilized to illustrate how Web 1.0 tribal historiography opposes theories of culture.

AB - Native American communities historically indigenous to the Columbia Plateau in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho use the internet in acts of historical representation. The internet provides to tribal people a medium through which to accurately represent issues of place, time, and performance. The internet, however, is changing, challenging some tribal representational practices. Participation with the internet is divided into two historical, technical, and cultural phases: Web 1.0 (1994–2004) and Web 2.0 (2005–today). The Web 1.0 sites discussed in this article include the Lifelong Learning modules of the Schitsu’umsh (Coeur d’Alene), the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (CTUIR), and the Nimíipuu (Nez Perce Tribe). Explored are ways Web 1.0 features gave tribal people control over their official historiography, while new forms of collective or Web 2.0 internet authorship may be endangering officially sanctioned tribal histories. An example of Web 2.0, the Colville tribal social media site One Heart for the People is briefly mobilized to illustrate how Web 1.0 tribal historiography opposes theories of culture.

KW - media

KW - indigenous

KW - ethnography

KW - culture

KW - internet

KW - social media

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 91

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Northwest Anthropology

JF - Journal of Northwest Anthropology

IS - 1

ER -