Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political A...
View graph of relations

Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism. / Wheatley, Steven.
Current Legal Issues. ed. / Michael Freeman; David Napier. Vol. 12 Oxford University Press (OUP), 2009. p. 351-384.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Wheatley, S 2009, Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism. in M Freeman & D Napier (eds), Current Legal Issues. vol. 12, Oxford University Press (OUP), pp. 351-384. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

APA

Wheatley, S. (2009). Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism. In M. Freeman, & D. Napier (Eds.), Current Legal Issues (Vol. 12, pp. 351-384). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

Vancouver

Wheatley S. Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism. In Freeman M, Napier D, editors, Current Legal Issues. Vol. 12. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2009. p. 351-384 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

Author

Wheatley, Steven. / Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism. Current Legal Issues. editor / Michael Freeman ; David Napier. Vol. 12 Oxford University Press (OUP), 2009. pp. 351-384

Bibtex

@inbook{5ad05a14461743b7af5e80c2ff2d49a7,
title = "Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism",
abstract = "This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are 'peoples' with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this 'meta-perspective' to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.",
keywords = "Global governance, Indigenous peoples, Law norms, Legal pluralism",
author = "Steven Wheatley",
year = "2009",
month = nov,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780199580910",
volume = "12",
pages = "351--384",
editor = "Michael Freeman and Napier, {David }",
booktitle = "Current Legal Issues",
publisher = "Oxford University Press (OUP)",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Indigenous Peoples and the Right of Political Autonomy in an Age of Global Legal Pluralism

AU - Wheatley, Steven

PY - 2009/11/19

Y1 - 2009/11/19

N2 - This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are 'peoples' with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this 'meta-perspective' to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.

AB - This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are 'peoples' with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this 'meta-perspective' to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.

KW - Global governance

KW - Indigenous peoples

KW - Law norms

KW - Legal pluralism

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84920138587

SN - 9780199580910

VL - 12

SP - 351

EP - 384

BT - Current Legal Issues

A2 - Freeman, Michael

A2 - Napier, David

PB - Oxford University Press (OUP)

ER -