Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Individual versus collaborative note-taking

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing. / Courtney, M.; Costley, J.; Baldwin, M. et al.
In: Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 55, 100873, 31.10.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Courtney M, Costley J, Baldwin M, Lee K, Fanguy M. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing. Internet and Higher Education. 2022 Oct 31;55:100873. Epub 2022 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873

Author

Courtney, M. ; Costley, J. ; Baldwin, M. et al. / Individual versus collaborative note-taking : Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing. In: Internet and Higher Education. 2022 ; Vol. 55.

Bibtex

@article{0dbcdc2bf4af43cdae4f60051e027f69,
title = "Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing",
abstract = "There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.",
keywords = "Note-taking, Collaborative learning, Collaboration, Korea, Academic writing",
author = "M. Courtney and J. Costley and M. Baldwin and K. Lee and M. Fanguy",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
journal = "Internet and Higher Education",
issn = "1096-7516",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual versus collaborative note-taking

T2 - Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing

AU - Courtney, M.

AU - Costley, J.

AU - Baldwin, M.

AU - Lee, K.

AU - Fanguy, M.

PY - 2022/10/31

Y1 - 2022/10/31

N2 - There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.

AB - There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.

KW - Note-taking

KW - Collaborative learning

KW - Collaboration

KW - Korea

KW - Academic writing

U2 - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873

DO - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

JO - Internet and Higher Education

JF - Internet and Higher Education

SN - 1096-7516

M1 - 100873

ER -