Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual versus collaborative note-taking
T2 - Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing
AU - Courtney, M.
AU - Costley, J.
AU - Baldwin, M.
AU - Lee, K.
AU - Fanguy, M.
PY - 2022/10/31
Y1 - 2022/10/31
N2 - There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.
AB - There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.
KW - Note-taking
KW - Collaborative learning
KW - Collaboration
KW - Korea
KW - Academic writing
U2 - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
DO - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
M3 - Journal article
VL - 55
JO - Internet and Higher Education
JF - Internet and Higher Education
SN - 1096-7516
M1 - 100873
ER -