Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Individualized survival prediction and surgery ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma. / Zhu, Enzhao; Wang, Jiayi; Jing, Qi et al.
In: Frontiers in Medicine, Vol. 11, 1330907, 09.05.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Zhu, E, Wang, J, Jing, Q, Shi, W, Xu, Z, Ai, P, Chen, Z, Dai, Z, Shan, D & Ai, Z 2024, 'Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma', Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 11, 1330907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907

APA

Zhu, E., Wang, J., Jing, Q., Shi, W., Xu, Z., Ai, P., Chen, Z., Dai, Z., Shan, D., & Ai, Z. (2024). Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, Article 1330907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907

Vancouver

Zhu E, Wang J, Jing Q, Shi W, Xu Z, Ai P et al. Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024 May 9;11:1330907. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907

Author

Zhu, Enzhao ; Wang, Jiayi ; Jing, Qi et al. / Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma. In: Frontiers in Medicine. 2024 ; Vol. 11.

Bibtex

@article{8f4607d9c9684519a66b862c05c172a8,
title = "Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma",
abstract = "Background: There is a lack of individualized evidence on surgical choices for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Aim: This study aimed to make individualized treatment recommendations for patients with GBM and to determine the importance of demographic and tumor characteristic variables in the selection of extent of resection. Methods: We proposed Balanced Decision Ensembles (BDE) to make survival predictions and individualized treatment recommendations. We developed several DL models to counterfactually predict the individual treatment effect (ITE) of patients with GBM. We divided the patients into the recommended (Rec.) and anti-recommended groups based on whether their actual treatment was consistent with the model recommendation. Results: The BDE achieved the best recommendation effects (difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST): 5.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.40–7.39; hazard ratio (HR): 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65–0.77), followed by BITES and DeepSurv. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted HR, IPTW-adjusted OR, natural direct effect, and control direct effect demonstrated better survival outcomes of the Rec. group. Conclusion: The ITE calculation method is crucial, as it may result in better or worse recommendations. Furthermore, the significant protective effects of machine recommendations on survival time and mortality indicate the superiority of the model for application in patients with GBM. Overall, the model identifies patients with tumors located in the right and left frontal and middle temporal lobes, as well as those with larger tumor sizes, as optimal candidates for SpTR.",
keywords = "deep learning, treatment recommendation, causal inference, glioblastoma, neurosurgery",
author = "Enzhao Zhu and Jiayi Wang and Qi Jing and Weizhong Shi and Ziqin Xu and Pu Ai and Zhihao Chen and Zhihao Dai and Dan Shan and Zisheng Ai",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "9",
doi = "10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers in Medicine",
issn = "2296-858X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma

AU - Zhu, Enzhao

AU - Wang, Jiayi

AU - Jing, Qi

AU - Shi, Weizhong

AU - Xu, Ziqin

AU - Ai, Pu

AU - Chen, Zhihao

AU - Dai, Zhihao

AU - Shan, Dan

AU - Ai, Zisheng

PY - 2024/5/9

Y1 - 2024/5/9

N2 - Background: There is a lack of individualized evidence on surgical choices for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Aim: This study aimed to make individualized treatment recommendations for patients with GBM and to determine the importance of demographic and tumor characteristic variables in the selection of extent of resection. Methods: We proposed Balanced Decision Ensembles (BDE) to make survival predictions and individualized treatment recommendations. We developed several DL models to counterfactually predict the individual treatment effect (ITE) of patients with GBM. We divided the patients into the recommended (Rec.) and anti-recommended groups based on whether their actual treatment was consistent with the model recommendation. Results: The BDE achieved the best recommendation effects (difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST): 5.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.40–7.39; hazard ratio (HR): 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65–0.77), followed by BITES and DeepSurv. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted HR, IPTW-adjusted OR, natural direct effect, and control direct effect demonstrated better survival outcomes of the Rec. group. Conclusion: The ITE calculation method is crucial, as it may result in better or worse recommendations. Furthermore, the significant protective effects of machine recommendations on survival time and mortality indicate the superiority of the model for application in patients with GBM. Overall, the model identifies patients with tumors located in the right and left frontal and middle temporal lobes, as well as those with larger tumor sizes, as optimal candidates for SpTR.

AB - Background: There is a lack of individualized evidence on surgical choices for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Aim: This study aimed to make individualized treatment recommendations for patients with GBM and to determine the importance of demographic and tumor characteristic variables in the selection of extent of resection. Methods: We proposed Balanced Decision Ensembles (BDE) to make survival predictions and individualized treatment recommendations. We developed several DL models to counterfactually predict the individual treatment effect (ITE) of patients with GBM. We divided the patients into the recommended (Rec.) and anti-recommended groups based on whether their actual treatment was consistent with the model recommendation. Results: The BDE achieved the best recommendation effects (difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST): 5.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.40–7.39; hazard ratio (HR): 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65–0.77), followed by BITES and DeepSurv. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted HR, IPTW-adjusted OR, natural direct effect, and control direct effect demonstrated better survival outcomes of the Rec. group. Conclusion: The ITE calculation method is crucial, as it may result in better or worse recommendations. Furthermore, the significant protective effects of machine recommendations on survival time and mortality indicate the superiority of the model for application in patients with GBM. Overall, the model identifies patients with tumors located in the right and left frontal and middle temporal lobes, as well as those with larger tumor sizes, as optimal candidates for SpTR.

KW - deep learning

KW - treatment recommendation

KW - causal inference

KW - glioblastoma

KW - neurosurgery

U2 - 10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907

DO - 10.3389/fmed.2024.1330907

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers in Medicine

JF - Frontiers in Medicine

SN - 2296-858X

M1 - 1330907

ER -