Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Emplo...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Employees Working from Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Employees Working from Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study. / Rho, Taehyun; Moreno Rangel, Alejandro; Baek, Juha et al.
In: Atmosphere, Vol. 12, No. 12, 1665, 11.12.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rho T, Moreno Rangel A, Baek J, Obeng A, Tasnim Hasan N, Carrillo G. Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Employees Working from Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study. Atmosphere. 2021 Dec 11;12(12):1665. doi: 10.3390/atmos12121665

Author

Bibtex

@article{58d05ff3a0df4104ad369a34819dbe73,
title = "Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Employees Working from Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Indoor air quality (IAQ) has a significant impact on human health. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, more employees have worked remotely from home to reduce in-person contacts. This pilot study aims to measure the difference in workplace IAQ before and during the pandemic and its impact on employees{\textquoteright} health. The levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and total volatile organic chemicals (tVOC) were measured in the employees{\textquoteright} offices before the COVID-19 pandemic and at homes while working from home during the pandemic using Foobot air monitors. The frequencies of six Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms were evaluated at each period of monitoring. The result showed PM2.5 levels in households while working from home were significantly higher than in offices while working at the office in all participants (p<0.05). All households showed PM2.5 levels greater than the annual mean standard (12 µg/m3), while 90% of offices were in compliance. The tVOC levels were all below the guideline. We also found that more frequencies of SBS symptoms were observed while working from home as the IAQ was worse at home. This study suggested that working from home might have a detrimental health impact due to poor IAQ and providing interventions in remote employees should be considered.",
keywords = "indoor air quality, air monitor, particulate matter 2.5, COVID-19, employee health, remote work",
author = "Taehyun Rho and {Moreno Rangel}, Alejandro and Juha Baek and Alexander Obeng and {Tasnim Hasan}, Nishat and Genny Carrillo",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "11",
doi = "10.3390/atmos12121665",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Atmosphere",
issn = "2073-4433",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indoor Air Quality and Health Outcomes in Employees Working from Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Rho, Taehyun

AU - Moreno Rangel, Alejandro

AU - Baek, Juha

AU - Obeng, Alexander

AU - Tasnim Hasan, Nishat

AU - Carrillo, Genny

PY - 2021/12/11

Y1 - 2021/12/11

N2 - Indoor air quality (IAQ) has a significant impact on human health. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, more employees have worked remotely from home to reduce in-person contacts. This pilot study aims to measure the difference in workplace IAQ before and during the pandemic and its impact on employees’ health. The levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and total volatile organic chemicals (tVOC) were measured in the employees’ offices before the COVID-19 pandemic and at homes while working from home during the pandemic using Foobot air monitors. The frequencies of six Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms were evaluated at each period of monitoring. The result showed PM2.5 levels in households while working from home were significantly higher than in offices while working at the office in all participants (p<0.05). All households showed PM2.5 levels greater than the annual mean standard (12 µg/m3), while 90% of offices were in compliance. The tVOC levels were all below the guideline. We also found that more frequencies of SBS symptoms were observed while working from home as the IAQ was worse at home. This study suggested that working from home might have a detrimental health impact due to poor IAQ and providing interventions in remote employees should be considered.

AB - Indoor air quality (IAQ) has a significant impact on human health. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, more employees have worked remotely from home to reduce in-person contacts. This pilot study aims to measure the difference in workplace IAQ before and during the pandemic and its impact on employees’ health. The levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and total volatile organic chemicals (tVOC) were measured in the employees’ offices before the COVID-19 pandemic and at homes while working from home during the pandemic using Foobot air monitors. The frequencies of six Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms were evaluated at each period of monitoring. The result showed PM2.5 levels in households while working from home were significantly higher than in offices while working at the office in all participants (p<0.05). All households showed PM2.5 levels greater than the annual mean standard (12 µg/m3), while 90% of offices were in compliance. The tVOC levels were all below the guideline. We also found that more frequencies of SBS symptoms were observed while working from home as the IAQ was worse at home. This study suggested that working from home might have a detrimental health impact due to poor IAQ and providing interventions in remote employees should be considered.

KW - indoor air quality

KW - air monitor

KW - particulate matter 2.5

KW - COVID-19

KW - employee health

KW - remote work

U2 - 10.3390/atmos12121665

DO - 10.3390/atmos12121665

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

JO - Atmosphere

JF - Atmosphere

SN - 2073-4433

IS - 12

M1 - 1665

ER -