Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Infants need more variety – increased data acqu...

Electronic data

  • Fpsyg 04 00117

    Rights statement: Copyright: © 2013 Stets, Burt and Reid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

    Final published version, 1.5 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Infants need more variety – increased data acquisition with reduced participant attrition in infant ERP studies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Infants need more variety – increased data acquisition with reduced participant attrition in infant ERP studies. / Stets, Manuela; Burt, Mike; Reid, Vincent.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 117, 18.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Stets M, Burt M, Reid V. Infants need more variety – increased data acquisition with reduced participant attrition in infant ERP studies. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013 Mar 18;4(117). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00117

Author

Bibtex

@article{a88de43b930a4800b7ea340312b56fa0,
title = "Infants need more variety – increased data acquisition with reduced participant attrition in infant ERP studies",
abstract = "Infant ERP studies often feature high attrition rates with large numbers of trials excluded from statistical analyses. The number of experimental conditions is conventionally limited to reduce the test-sessions{\textquoteright} durations and to ensure that reasonable trial-numbers will be obtained for each condition. Here, we designed an ERP study involving eight conditions originating from three previously published studies and presented them to 18 1-year-olds. We expected to replicate original results at least partly. Additionally, we were interested in the effect this novel method of stimulus presentation would have on infant attention. Due to the requirement for sustained attention, interest may decrease. Alternatively, the stimulus-variability may extend attention, allowing the acquisition of more valid trials. Our main finding was that the variability of the stimulus presentation sustained the infants{\textquoteright} attention beyond normal parameters. This is apparent from the markedly increased number of artifact-free trials obtained and from the substantially decreased attrition rates. Results from a gap-/no gap-task were fully replicated whereas others, related to face-processing, were replicated in part. Additionally, effects that were not reported in the original studies were found. This is most probably due to interference in the information processing between these conditions. The results show that presenting infants with varied stimuli extends their attention, allowing the acquisition of at least four times more data than via current infant ERP methods. However, stimuli from separate sub-experiments must be cognitively and perceptually distinct, otherwise contamination between related factors will occur.",
keywords = "infant, ERPs , stimulus presentation , data-collection , attrition , methodology",
author = "Manuela Stets and Mike Burt and Vincent Reid",
note = "Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013 Stets, Burt and Reid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "18",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00117",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "117",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infants need more variety – increased data acquisition with reduced participant attrition in infant ERP studies

AU - Stets, Manuela

AU - Burt, Mike

AU - Reid, Vincent

N1 - Copyright: © 2013 Stets, Burt and Reid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

PY - 2013/3/18

Y1 - 2013/3/18

N2 - Infant ERP studies often feature high attrition rates with large numbers of trials excluded from statistical analyses. The number of experimental conditions is conventionally limited to reduce the test-sessions’ durations and to ensure that reasonable trial-numbers will be obtained for each condition. Here, we designed an ERP study involving eight conditions originating from three previously published studies and presented them to 18 1-year-olds. We expected to replicate original results at least partly. Additionally, we were interested in the effect this novel method of stimulus presentation would have on infant attention. Due to the requirement for sustained attention, interest may decrease. Alternatively, the stimulus-variability may extend attention, allowing the acquisition of more valid trials. Our main finding was that the variability of the stimulus presentation sustained the infants’ attention beyond normal parameters. This is apparent from the markedly increased number of artifact-free trials obtained and from the substantially decreased attrition rates. Results from a gap-/no gap-task were fully replicated whereas others, related to face-processing, were replicated in part. Additionally, effects that were not reported in the original studies were found. This is most probably due to interference in the information processing between these conditions. The results show that presenting infants with varied stimuli extends their attention, allowing the acquisition of at least four times more data than via current infant ERP methods. However, stimuli from separate sub-experiments must be cognitively and perceptually distinct, otherwise contamination between related factors will occur.

AB - Infant ERP studies often feature high attrition rates with large numbers of trials excluded from statistical analyses. The number of experimental conditions is conventionally limited to reduce the test-sessions’ durations and to ensure that reasonable trial-numbers will be obtained for each condition. Here, we designed an ERP study involving eight conditions originating from three previously published studies and presented them to 18 1-year-olds. We expected to replicate original results at least partly. Additionally, we were interested in the effect this novel method of stimulus presentation would have on infant attention. Due to the requirement for sustained attention, interest may decrease. Alternatively, the stimulus-variability may extend attention, allowing the acquisition of more valid trials. Our main finding was that the variability of the stimulus presentation sustained the infants’ attention beyond normal parameters. This is apparent from the markedly increased number of artifact-free trials obtained and from the substantially decreased attrition rates. Results from a gap-/no gap-task were fully replicated whereas others, related to face-processing, were replicated in part. Additionally, effects that were not reported in the original studies were found. This is most probably due to interference in the information processing between these conditions. The results show that presenting infants with varied stimuli extends their attention, allowing the acquisition of at least four times more data than via current infant ERP methods. However, stimuli from separate sub-experiments must be cognitively and perceptually distinct, otherwise contamination between related factors will occur.

KW - infant

KW - ERPs

KW - stimulus presentation

KW - data-collection

KW - attrition

KW - methodology

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00117

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00117

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - 117

ER -