Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers
AU - Banerjee, Shantanu
AU - Dasgupta, Sudipto
AU - Shi, Rui
AU - Yan, Jiali
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference-in-Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks” (Lambert et al. [2007], Leuz and Schrand [2009]). Disclosure by close peers – especially those with co-coverage and co-ownership links – also increases following fraud revelation. While disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.
AB - We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference-in-Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks” (Lambert et al. [2007], Leuz and Schrand [2009]). Disclosure by close peers – especially those with co-coverage and co-ownership links – also increases following fraud revelation. While disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.
KW - : Cost of equity, Disclosure, Transparency, Information Environment, Information Complementarity
UR - https://www.chicagobooth.edu/research/chookaszian/journal-of-accounting-research/forthcoming-in-jar
M3 - Journal article
JO - Journal of Accounting Research
JF - Journal of Accounting Research
SN - 0021-8456
ER -