Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ingredients for change

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. / Rycroft-Malone, J.; Kitson, A.; Harvey, G. et al.
In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.06.2002, p. 174-180.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Rycroft-Malone, J, Kitson, A, Harvey, G, McCormack, B, Seers, K, Titchen, A & Estabrooks, C 2002, 'Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework', BMJ Quality and Safety, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

APA

Rycroft-Malone, J., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., Titchen, A., & Estabrooks, C. (2002). Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. BMJ Quality and Safety, 11(2), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

Vancouver

Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A et al. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2002 Jun 1;11(2):174-180. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

Author

Rycroft-Malone, J. ; Kitson, A. ; Harvey, G. et al. / Ingredients for change : revisiting a conceptual framework. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2002 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 174-180.

Bibtex

@article{23d608b90f554483b89d83fef63dc328,
title = "Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework",
abstract = "Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework—evidence, context, and facilitation—leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.",
keywords = "HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES",
author = "J. Rycroft-Malone and A. Kitson and G. Harvey and B. McCormack and K. Seers and A. Titchen and C. Estabrooks",
year = "2002",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/qhc.11.2.174",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "174--180",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "1475-3901",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ingredients for change

T2 - revisiting a conceptual framework

AU - Rycroft-Malone, J.

AU - Kitson, A.

AU - Harvey, G.

AU - McCormack, B.

AU - Seers, K.

AU - Titchen, A.

AU - Estabrooks, C.

PY - 2002/6/1

Y1 - 2002/6/1

N2 - Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework—evidence, context, and facilitation—leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.

AB - Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework—evidence, context, and facilitation—leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.

KW - HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

U2 - 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

DO - 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 174

EP - 180

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 1475-3901

IS - 2

ER -