Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries. / Waling, Andrea.
In: The Journal of Men’s Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, 31.03.2023, p. 130-156.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Waling A. ‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries. The Journal of Men’s Studies. 2023 Mar 31;31(1):130-156. Epub 2022 May 29. doi: 10.1177/10608265221092044

Author

Bibtex

@article{cf9a9399799646638bdc350cf3c2b193,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity{\textquoteright}: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries",
abstract = "This article examines what discourses and assumed subject positions have emerged about men and masculinity in #MeToo debates. Using feminist critical discourse analysis and an exploratory approach to analyze 163 media articles, five key framings are noted: men are victims of masculinity requiring intervention, men are positioned as inherently {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}bad{\textquoteright}, boys and men are lost and need to be found, men are performative in their {\textquoteleft}awakenings{\textquoteright}, and men{\textquoteright}s take up of protector or allyship roles may in fact be attempts to be false heroes. The findings of this work note several tensions and contradictions that highlight an overall lack of coherency and agreement regarding men{\textquoteright}s engagements with, and roles in, the #MeToo movement. These contradictions and tensions have implications for thinking about gender equality and gendered violence prevention initiatives.",
author = "Andrea Waling",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/10608265221092044",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "130--156",
journal = "The Journal of Men{\textquoteright}s Studies",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’

T2 - Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries

AU - Waling, Andrea

PY - 2023/3/31

Y1 - 2023/3/31

N2 - This article examines what discourses and assumed subject positions have emerged about men and masculinity in #MeToo debates. Using feminist critical discourse analysis and an exploratory approach to analyze 163 media articles, five key framings are noted: men are victims of masculinity requiring intervention, men are positioned as inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’, boys and men are lost and need to be found, men are performative in their ‘awakenings’, and men’s take up of protector or allyship roles may in fact be attempts to be false heroes. The findings of this work note several tensions and contradictions that highlight an overall lack of coherency and agreement regarding men’s engagements with, and roles in, the #MeToo movement. These contradictions and tensions have implications for thinking about gender equality and gendered violence prevention initiatives.

AB - This article examines what discourses and assumed subject positions have emerged about men and masculinity in #MeToo debates. Using feminist critical discourse analysis and an exploratory approach to analyze 163 media articles, five key framings are noted: men are victims of masculinity requiring intervention, men are positioned as inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’, boys and men are lost and need to be found, men are performative in their ‘awakenings’, and men’s take up of protector or allyship roles may in fact be attempts to be false heroes. The findings of this work note several tensions and contradictions that highlight an overall lack of coherency and agreement regarding men’s engagements with, and roles in, the #MeToo movement. These contradictions and tensions have implications for thinking about gender equality and gendered violence prevention initiatives.

U2 - 10.1177/10608265221092044

DO - 10.1177/10608265221092044

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 130

EP - 156

JO - The Journal of Men’s Studies

JF - The Journal of Men’s Studies

IS - 1

ER -