Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discre...

Electronic data

  • IOU-C_final

    Rights statement: Copyright 2019 INFORMS

    Accepted author manuscript, 497 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation. / Song, Eunhye; Nelson, Barry.
In: Operations Research, Vol. 67, No. 2, 23.04.2019, p. 562-576.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Song E, Nelson B. Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation. Operations Research. 2019 Apr 23;67(2):562-576. Epub 2019 Mar 29. doi: 10.1287/opre.2018.1796

Author

Song, Eunhye ; Nelson, Barry. / Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation. In: Operations Research. 2019 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 562-576.

Bibtex

@article{e1a497a4b71d41529a62719df9e5c3ec,
title = "Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation",
abstract = "When input distributions to a simulation model are estimated from real-worlddata, they naturally have estimation error causing input uncertainty in the simulation output.If an optimization via simulation (OvS) method is applied that treats the input distributions as “correct,” then there is a risk of making a suboptimal decision for the real world, which we call input model risk. This paper addresses a discrete OvS (DOvS) problem of selecting the realworld optimal from among a finite number of systems when all of them share the same input distributions estimated from common input data. Because input uncertainty cannot be reduced without collecting additional real-world data—which may be expensive or impossible—a DOvS procedure should reflect the limited resolution provided by the simulation model in distinguishing the real-world optimal solution from the others. In light of this, our input–output uncertainty comparisons (IOU-C) procedure focuses on comparisons rather than selection: it provides simultaneous confidence intervals for the difference between each system{\textquoteright}s real-world mean and the best mean of the rest with any desired probability, while accounting for both stochastic and input uncertainty. To make the resolution as high as possible (intervals as short as possible) we exploit the common input data effect to reduce uncertainty in the estimated differences. Under mild conditions we prove that the IOU-C procedure provides the desired statistical guarantee asymptotically as the real-world sample size and simulation effort increase, but it is designed to be effective in finite samples.",
author = "Eunhye Song and Barry Nelson",
note = "Copyright 2019 INFORMS",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1287/opre.2018.1796",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "562--576",
journal = "Operations Research",
issn = "0030-364X",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Input–output uncertainty comparisons for discrete optimization via simulation

AU - Song, Eunhye

AU - Nelson, Barry

N1 - Copyright 2019 INFORMS

PY - 2019/4/23

Y1 - 2019/4/23

N2 - When input distributions to a simulation model are estimated from real-worlddata, they naturally have estimation error causing input uncertainty in the simulation output.If an optimization via simulation (OvS) method is applied that treats the input distributions as “correct,” then there is a risk of making a suboptimal decision for the real world, which we call input model risk. This paper addresses a discrete OvS (DOvS) problem of selecting the realworld optimal from among a finite number of systems when all of them share the same input distributions estimated from common input data. Because input uncertainty cannot be reduced without collecting additional real-world data—which may be expensive or impossible—a DOvS procedure should reflect the limited resolution provided by the simulation model in distinguishing the real-world optimal solution from the others. In light of this, our input–output uncertainty comparisons (IOU-C) procedure focuses on comparisons rather than selection: it provides simultaneous confidence intervals for the difference between each system’s real-world mean and the best mean of the rest with any desired probability, while accounting for both stochastic and input uncertainty. To make the resolution as high as possible (intervals as short as possible) we exploit the common input data effect to reduce uncertainty in the estimated differences. Under mild conditions we prove that the IOU-C procedure provides the desired statistical guarantee asymptotically as the real-world sample size and simulation effort increase, but it is designed to be effective in finite samples.

AB - When input distributions to a simulation model are estimated from real-worlddata, they naturally have estimation error causing input uncertainty in the simulation output.If an optimization via simulation (OvS) method is applied that treats the input distributions as “correct,” then there is a risk of making a suboptimal decision for the real world, which we call input model risk. This paper addresses a discrete OvS (DOvS) problem of selecting the realworld optimal from among a finite number of systems when all of them share the same input distributions estimated from common input data. Because input uncertainty cannot be reduced without collecting additional real-world data—which may be expensive or impossible—a DOvS procedure should reflect the limited resolution provided by the simulation model in distinguishing the real-world optimal solution from the others. In light of this, our input–output uncertainty comparisons (IOU-C) procedure focuses on comparisons rather than selection: it provides simultaneous confidence intervals for the difference between each system’s real-world mean and the best mean of the rest with any desired probability, while accounting for both stochastic and input uncertainty. To make the resolution as high as possible (intervals as short as possible) we exploit the common input data effect to reduce uncertainty in the estimated differences. Under mild conditions we prove that the IOU-C procedure provides the desired statistical guarantee asymptotically as the real-world sample size and simulation effort increase, but it is designed to be effective in finite samples.

U2 - 10.1287/opre.2018.1796

DO - 10.1287/opre.2018.1796

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 562

EP - 576

JO - Operations Research

JF - Operations Research

SN - 0030-364X

IS - 2

ER -