Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inputs and outcomes

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inputs and outcomes: what do staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities perceive they bring to and receive from their work-based relationships?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Inputs and outcomes: what do staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities perceive they bring to and receive from their work-based relationships? / Disley, Philip; Hatton, Chris; Dagnan, Dave.
In: June 2002. ISSN 1460-4582, Vol. 16, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 297-306.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{314a4217fb2446a48e43f062216fecd8,
title = "Inputs and outcomes: what do staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities perceive they bring to and receive from their work-based relationships?",
abstract = "A number of studies involving staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities have utilised equity theory as a theoretical framework. According to this theory, people evaluate social relationships through the comparison of inputs and outcomes, respectively, with what a person brings to and receives from a relationship. Little is known about what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 staff to find out what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff who work with people with intellectual disabilities. The interviews were conducted in the first half of 2008 in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using template analysis. A wide range of inputs and outcomes was identified by staff, which were grouped under high-level themes relating to relationships with their employers, their co-workers and the service users. The utility of the findings, in terms of informing future research, is discussed.",
keywords = "Qualitative Research, Humans, Psychological Theory, Quality of Life, Intellectual Disability, Interprofessional Relations, Great Britain, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Health Personnel, Social Support, Social Justice, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Female, Male",
author = "Philip Disley and Chris Hatton and Dave Dagnan",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/1744629512466793",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "297--306",
journal = "June 2002. ISSN 1460-4582",
issn = "1939-1293",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inputs and outcomes

T2 - what do staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities perceive they bring to and receive from their work-based relationships?

AU - Disley, Philip

AU - Hatton, Chris

AU - Dagnan, Dave

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - A number of studies involving staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities have utilised equity theory as a theoretical framework. According to this theory, people evaluate social relationships through the comparison of inputs and outcomes, respectively, with what a person brings to and receives from a relationship. Little is known about what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 staff to find out what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff who work with people with intellectual disabilities. The interviews were conducted in the first half of 2008 in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using template analysis. A wide range of inputs and outcomes was identified by staff, which were grouped under high-level themes relating to relationships with their employers, their co-workers and the service users. The utility of the findings, in terms of informing future research, is discussed.

AB - A number of studies involving staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities have utilised equity theory as a theoretical framework. According to this theory, people evaluate social relationships through the comparison of inputs and outcomes, respectively, with what a person brings to and receives from a relationship. Little is known about what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 staff to find out what constitute inputs and outcomes for staff who work with people with intellectual disabilities. The interviews were conducted in the first half of 2008 in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using template analysis. A wide range of inputs and outcomes was identified by staff, which were grouped under high-level themes relating to relationships with their employers, their co-workers and the service users. The utility of the findings, in terms of informing future research, is discussed.

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Humans

KW - Psychological Theory

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Intellectual Disability

KW - Interprofessional Relations

KW - Great Britain

KW - Adaptation, Psychological

KW - Adult

KW - Health Personnel

KW - Social Support

KW - Social Justice

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Professional-Patient Relations

KW - Female

KW - Male

U2 - 10.1177/1744629512466793

DO - 10.1177/1744629512466793

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23151523

VL - 16

SP - 297

EP - 306

JO - June 2002. ISSN 1460-4582

JF - June 2002. ISSN 1460-4582

SN - 1939-1293

IS - 4

ER -