Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Integration versus separation

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Integration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Integration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations. / Derrick, G. E.
In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 40, No. 1, 02.2015, p. 105-122.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Derrick GE. Integration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2015 Feb;40(1):105-122. Epub 2014 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1

Author

Bibtex

@article{447312baf4d74535aa62838bca67c2aa,
title = "Integration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations",
abstract = "Establishing technology transfer offices (TTOs) within research organizations is one initiative used to facilitate successful commercialization. Research organizations may choose to either outsource the commercialization expertise (separation model) or incorporate it within their organizational structure (integration model). Ensuring the success of these integration TTOs, face many challenges, including challenges based on tensions from researchers within research organizations about the perceived differences in opinions, rules, norms and reward systems of research and commercialization. Using qualitative data from interviews from researchers and the integrated TTO personnel, this paper describes the interactions of researchers and integrated TTO personnel in five Australian medical research organizations. Despite strong researcher concerns and fears about research commercialization, a number of strategies employed by integrated TTOs were identified to encourage researcher engagement. These include the flexibility of TTO policies to researcher needs; offering collective incentives; and being visible within the organization.",
keywords = "Technology Transfer Office (TTO), Research Management, Qualitative research, Commercialization, UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY, NATIONAL-SURVEY, LIFE-SCIENCE, KNOWLEDGE, INDUSTRY, FACULTY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, SCIENTISTS, FIRMS",
author = "Derrick, {G. E.}",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "105--122",
journal = "The Journal of Technology Transfer",
issn = "0892-9912",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integration versus separation

T2 - structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations

AU - Derrick, G. E.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - Establishing technology transfer offices (TTOs) within research organizations is one initiative used to facilitate successful commercialization. Research organizations may choose to either outsource the commercialization expertise (separation model) or incorporate it within their organizational structure (integration model). Ensuring the success of these integration TTOs, face many challenges, including challenges based on tensions from researchers within research organizations about the perceived differences in opinions, rules, norms and reward systems of research and commercialization. Using qualitative data from interviews from researchers and the integrated TTO personnel, this paper describes the interactions of researchers and integrated TTO personnel in five Australian medical research organizations. Despite strong researcher concerns and fears about research commercialization, a number of strategies employed by integrated TTOs were identified to encourage researcher engagement. These include the flexibility of TTO policies to researcher needs; offering collective incentives; and being visible within the organization.

AB - Establishing technology transfer offices (TTOs) within research organizations is one initiative used to facilitate successful commercialization. Research organizations may choose to either outsource the commercialization expertise (separation model) or incorporate it within their organizational structure (integration model). Ensuring the success of these integration TTOs, face many challenges, including challenges based on tensions from researchers within research organizations about the perceived differences in opinions, rules, norms and reward systems of research and commercialization. Using qualitative data from interviews from researchers and the integrated TTO personnel, this paper describes the interactions of researchers and integrated TTO personnel in five Australian medical research organizations. Despite strong researcher concerns and fears about research commercialization, a number of strategies employed by integrated TTOs were identified to encourage researcher engagement. These include the flexibility of TTO policies to researcher needs; offering collective incentives; and being visible within the organization.

KW - Technology Transfer Office (TTO)

KW - Research Management

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Commercialization

KW - UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY

KW - NATIONAL-SURVEY

KW - LIFE-SCIENCE

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - INDUSTRY

KW - FACULTY

KW - BIOTECHNOLOGY

KW - SCIENTISTS

KW - FIRMS

U2 - 10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1

DO - 10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 105

EP - 122

JO - The Journal of Technology Transfer

JF - The Journal of Technology Transfer

SN - 0892-9912

IS - 1

ER -