Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intention to learn influences the word frequenc...
View graph of relations

Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory. / Dewhurst, Steve A.; Brandt, Karen R.; Sharp, Melanie S.
In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 32, No. 8, 12.2004, p. 1316-1325.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dewhurst SA, Brandt KR, Sharp MS. Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition. 2004 Dec;32(8):1316-1325.

Author

Dewhurst, Steve A. ; Brandt, Karen R. ; Sharp, Melanie S. / Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory. In: Memory and Cognition. 2004 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 1316-1325.

Bibtex

@article{ee7808a4ad3e41ef8bcc719d3101bf05,
title = "Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.",
abstract = "Watkins, LeCompte, and Kim (2000) suggested that the recall advantage for rare words in mixed lists is due to a compensatory study strategy that favors the rare words. They found the advantage was reversed when rare and common words were studied under incidental learning conditions. The present study investigated the possibility that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is also the result of a compensatory study strategy. Experiment 1 replicated the findings of Watkins et al. that the rareword advantage in recall is eliminated under incidental learning conditions. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is maintained under both intentional and incidental learning conditions. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using different stimuli and a different orienting task. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition is maintained with pure lists. These findings show that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is not the result of a compensatory study strategy. Instead, rare words are encoded more distinctively than common words, irrespective of participants' intention to remember them.",
author = "Dewhurst, {Steve A.} and Brandt, {Karen R.} and Sharp, {Melanie S.}",
year = "2004",
month = dec,
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1316--1325",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

AU - Dewhurst, Steve A.

AU - Brandt, Karen R.

AU - Sharp, Melanie S.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Watkins, LeCompte, and Kim (2000) suggested that the recall advantage for rare words in mixed lists is due to a compensatory study strategy that favors the rare words. They found the advantage was reversed when rare and common words were studied under incidental learning conditions. The present study investigated the possibility that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is also the result of a compensatory study strategy. Experiment 1 replicated the findings of Watkins et al. that the rareword advantage in recall is eliminated under incidental learning conditions. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is maintained under both intentional and incidental learning conditions. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using different stimuli and a different orienting task. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition is maintained with pure lists. These findings show that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is not the result of a compensatory study strategy. Instead, rare words are encoded more distinctively than common words, irrespective of participants' intention to remember them.

AB - Watkins, LeCompte, and Kim (2000) suggested that the recall advantage for rare words in mixed lists is due to a compensatory study strategy that favors the rare words. They found the advantage was reversed when rare and common words were studied under incidental learning conditions. The present study investigated the possibility that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is also the result of a compensatory study strategy. Experiment 1 replicated the findings of Watkins et al. that the rareword advantage in recall is eliminated under incidental learning conditions. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is maintained under both intentional and incidental learning conditions. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using different stimuli and a different orienting task. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition is maintained with pure lists. These findings show that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is not the result of a compensatory study strategy. Instead, rare words are encoded more distinctively than common words, irrespective of participants' intention to remember them.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 1316

EP - 1325

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 8

ER -