Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Th...

Electronic data

  • JNLukacs_FinalSubmitted

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Affective Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Affective Disorders, 293, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.035

    Accepted author manuscript, 247 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder. / Lukacs, Julia; Sicilia, Anna; Jones, Steven et al.
In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 293, 01.10.2021, p. 305-313.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lukacs J, Sicilia A, Jones S, Perez Algorta G. Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021 Oct 1;293:305-313. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

Author

Lukacs, Julia ; Sicilia, Anna ; Jones, Steven et al. / Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021 ; Vol. 293. pp. 305-313.

Bibtex

@article{f15b5082deea4b46984fd55a917f25f4,
title = "Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder",
abstract = "Background. According to Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), qualitative, bottom-line,“gist” reasoning leads to less risk taking and more mature decision-making, lesseasily swayed by emotions than quantitative, detail-oriented, “verbatim” reasoning.In Bipolar disorder deleterious risky behaviors are common. Prior researchconfirmed the relationships posited between FTT and risk taking. We aim tounderstand whether FTT acts upon risk taking in the manner proposed in the FTTframework, namely, that (a) gist “values” mediate the role of “categorical gist”.Furthermore, the roles of mania and impulsivity, cited as factors for risk-taking,remain to be clarified. In this study, we investigate if (b) manic symptoms andimpulsivity moderate these relationships.Methods. Participants (N = 105) completed an online survey includingdemographics, clinical variables, symptomatology, FTT, risk taking and riskperception.Results. Mediational models indicated that (a) Gist Values mediated CategoricalGist{\textquoteright}s effect on risk taking, as expected by the FTT framework. (b) Impulsivitymoderates risk taking, but manic-type symptomatology does not.Limitations. Voluntary, self-report surveys may have low participant motivationand limit the diagnostic validity and the in-patient generalizability of the results.Conclusions. The results move beyond a focus on mood-related aspects of Bipolar disorder and confirm the importance of understanding reasoning processes like FTT in combination with impulsivity, as potential behavioral factors of risk taking in Bipolar disorder. The clarifications on FTT{\textquoteright}s functioning as a mechanism prescribe possible openings for more efficacious reduction of risky behaviors through behavioral interventions focusing on value creation.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Fuzzy-Trace theory, Decision-making, Risk taking, Gist, Verbatim",
author = "Julia Lukacs and Anna Sicilia and Steven Jones and {Perez Algorta}, Guillermo",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Affective Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Affective Disorders, 293, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.035",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "293",
pages = "305--313",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace Theory for risk taking behaviors in Bipolar disorder

AU - Lukacs, Julia

AU - Sicilia, Anna

AU - Jones, Steven

AU - Perez Algorta, Guillermo

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Affective Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Affective Disorders, 293, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.035

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - Background. According to Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), qualitative, bottom-line,“gist” reasoning leads to less risk taking and more mature decision-making, lesseasily swayed by emotions than quantitative, detail-oriented, “verbatim” reasoning.In Bipolar disorder deleterious risky behaviors are common. Prior researchconfirmed the relationships posited between FTT and risk taking. We aim tounderstand whether FTT acts upon risk taking in the manner proposed in the FTTframework, namely, that (a) gist “values” mediate the role of “categorical gist”.Furthermore, the roles of mania and impulsivity, cited as factors for risk-taking,remain to be clarified. In this study, we investigate if (b) manic symptoms andimpulsivity moderate these relationships.Methods. Participants (N = 105) completed an online survey includingdemographics, clinical variables, symptomatology, FTT, risk taking and riskperception.Results. Mediational models indicated that (a) Gist Values mediated CategoricalGist’s effect on risk taking, as expected by the FTT framework. (b) Impulsivitymoderates risk taking, but manic-type symptomatology does not.Limitations. Voluntary, self-report surveys may have low participant motivationand limit the diagnostic validity and the in-patient generalizability of the results.Conclusions. The results move beyond a focus on mood-related aspects of Bipolar disorder and confirm the importance of understanding reasoning processes like FTT in combination with impulsivity, as potential behavioral factors of risk taking in Bipolar disorder. The clarifications on FTT’s functioning as a mechanism prescribe possible openings for more efficacious reduction of risky behaviors through behavioral interventions focusing on value creation.

AB - Background. According to Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), qualitative, bottom-line,“gist” reasoning leads to less risk taking and more mature decision-making, lesseasily swayed by emotions than quantitative, detail-oriented, “verbatim” reasoning.In Bipolar disorder deleterious risky behaviors are common. Prior researchconfirmed the relationships posited between FTT and risk taking. We aim tounderstand whether FTT acts upon risk taking in the manner proposed in the FTTframework, namely, that (a) gist “values” mediate the role of “categorical gist”.Furthermore, the roles of mania and impulsivity, cited as factors for risk-taking,remain to be clarified. In this study, we investigate if (b) manic symptoms andimpulsivity moderate these relationships.Methods. Participants (N = 105) completed an online survey includingdemographics, clinical variables, symptomatology, FTT, risk taking and riskperception.Results. Mediational models indicated that (a) Gist Values mediated CategoricalGist’s effect on risk taking, as expected by the FTT framework. (b) Impulsivitymoderates risk taking, but manic-type symptomatology does not.Limitations. Voluntary, self-report surveys may have low participant motivationand limit the diagnostic validity and the in-patient generalizability of the results.Conclusions. The results move beyond a focus on mood-related aspects of Bipolar disorder and confirm the importance of understanding reasoning processes like FTT in combination with impulsivity, as potential behavioral factors of risk taking in Bipolar disorder. The clarifications on FTT’s functioning as a mechanism prescribe possible openings for more efficacious reduction of risky behaviors through behavioral interventions focusing on value creation.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Fuzzy-Trace theory

KW - Decision-making

KW - Risk taking

KW - Gist

KW - Verbatim

M3 - Journal article

VL - 293

SP - 305

EP - 313

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -