Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inter-comparison of satellite sensor land surfa...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inter-comparison of satellite sensor land surface phenology and ground phenology in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>16/04/2015
<mark>Journal</mark>Geophysical Research Letters
Issue number7
Volume42
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)2253-2260
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date1/04/15
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Land surface phenology (LSP) and ground phenology (GP) are both important sources of information for monitoring terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate changes. Each measures different vegetation phenological stages and has different sources of uncertainties, which make comparison in absolute terms challenging, and therefore, there has been limited attempts to evaluate the complementary nature of both measures. However, both LSP and GP are climate driven and therefore should exhibit similar interannual variation. LSP obtained from the whole time series of Medium-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer data was compared to thousands of deciduous tree ground phenology records of the Pan European Phenology network (PEP725). Correlations observed between the interannual time series of the satellite sensor estimates of phenology and PEP725 records revealed a close agreement (especially for Betula Pendula and Fagus Sylvatica species). In particular, 90% of the statistically significant correlations between LSP and GP were positive (mean R2 = 0.77). A large spatiotemporal correlation was observed between the dates of the start of season (end of season) from space and leaf unfolding (autumn coloring) at the ground (pseudo R2 of 0.70 (0.71)) through the application of nonlinear multivariate models, providing, for the first time, the ability to predict accurately the date of leaf unfolding (autumn coloring) across Europe (root-mean-square error of 5.97 days (6.75 days) over 365 days).

Bibliographic note

Copyright 2015 American Geophysical Union.