Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Interdisciplinarity and impact

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. / Wang, Jian; Thijs, Bart; Glänzel, Wolfgang.
In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 5, e0127298, 22.05.2015.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wang J, Thijs B, Glänzel W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127298

Author

Wang, Jian ; Thijs, Bart ; Glänzel, Wolfgang. / Interdisciplinarity and impact : Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{e0514a9a310242c6a576fb8fe868998a,
title = "Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity",
abstract = "Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as the solution to today's challenging scientific and societal problems, but the relationship between interdisciplinary research and scientific impact is still unclear. This paper studies the association between the degree of interdisciplinarity and the number of citations at the paper level. Different from previous studies compositing various aspects of interdisciplinarity into a single indicator, we use factor analysis to uncover distinct dimensions of interdisciplinarity corresponding to variety, balance, and disparity. We estimate Poisson models with journal fixed effects and robust standard errors to analyze the divergent relationships between these three factors and citations. We find that long-term (13-year) citations (1) increase at an increasing rate with variety, (2) decrease with balance, and (3) increase at a decreasing rate with disparity. Furthermore, interdisciplinarity also affects the process of citation accumulation: (1) although variety and disparity have positive effects on long-term citations, they have negative effects on short-term (3-year) citations, and (2) although balance has a negative effect on long-term citations, its negative effect is insignificant in the short run. These findings have important implications for interdisciplinary research and science policy.",
author = "Jian Wang and Bart Thijs and Wolfgang Gl{\"a}nzel",
year = "2015",
month = may,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0127298",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interdisciplinarity and impact

T2 - Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity

AU - Wang, Jian

AU - Thijs, Bart

AU - Glänzel, Wolfgang

PY - 2015/5/22

Y1 - 2015/5/22

N2 - Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as the solution to today's challenging scientific and societal problems, but the relationship between interdisciplinary research and scientific impact is still unclear. This paper studies the association between the degree of interdisciplinarity and the number of citations at the paper level. Different from previous studies compositing various aspects of interdisciplinarity into a single indicator, we use factor analysis to uncover distinct dimensions of interdisciplinarity corresponding to variety, balance, and disparity. We estimate Poisson models with journal fixed effects and robust standard errors to analyze the divergent relationships between these three factors and citations. We find that long-term (13-year) citations (1) increase at an increasing rate with variety, (2) decrease with balance, and (3) increase at a decreasing rate with disparity. Furthermore, interdisciplinarity also affects the process of citation accumulation: (1) although variety and disparity have positive effects on long-term citations, they have negative effects on short-term (3-year) citations, and (2) although balance has a negative effect on long-term citations, its negative effect is insignificant in the short run. These findings have important implications for interdisciplinary research and science policy.

AB - Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as the solution to today's challenging scientific and societal problems, but the relationship between interdisciplinary research and scientific impact is still unclear. This paper studies the association between the degree of interdisciplinarity and the number of citations at the paper level. Different from previous studies compositing various aspects of interdisciplinarity into a single indicator, we use factor analysis to uncover distinct dimensions of interdisciplinarity corresponding to variety, balance, and disparity. We estimate Poisson models with journal fixed effects and robust standard errors to analyze the divergent relationships between these three factors and citations. We find that long-term (13-year) citations (1) increase at an increasing rate with variety, (2) decrease with balance, and (3) increase at a decreasing rate with disparity. Furthermore, interdisciplinarity also affects the process of citation accumulation: (1) although variety and disparity have positive effects on long-term citations, they have negative effects on short-term (3-year) citations, and (2) although balance has a negative effect on long-term citations, its negative effect is insignificant in the short run. These findings have important implications for interdisciplinary research and science policy.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0127298

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0127298

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26001108

AN - SCOPUS:84930668471

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e0127298

ER -