Accepted author manuscript, 525 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: Unspecified
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - International law and its histories
T2 - methodological risks and opportunities
AU - Vadi, Valentina
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - The history of international law has recently come to the forefront of legal debates. Defined as the field of study that examines the evolution of public international law investigating state practice, the development of given legal concepts and the life and work of its makers, the history of international law (HIL) or international legal history has attracted the growing attention of international lawyers and legal historians, as well as other interested audiences. Despite its flourishing, the history of international law is still in search of a proper methodology. Two cultures of writing history compete in its making: ‘historians’ histories’ and ‘jurists’ histories’. While legal historians are interested in the past for its own sake and put it in context, lawyers tend to be interested in the past for the light it throws on the present. Several questions arise in this context. Should one stick to intra-disciplinary approaches, or endorse a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary stance, enabling international lawyers and legal historians to work together in mapping the history of international law? This article has an exploratory character and aims to address these questions investigating the converging divergences of the two cultures of writing the histories of international law.
AB - The history of international law has recently come to the forefront of legal debates. Defined as the field of study that examines the evolution of public international law investigating state practice, the development of given legal concepts and the life and work of its makers, the history of international law (HIL) or international legal history has attracted the growing attention of international lawyers and legal historians, as well as other interested audiences. Despite its flourishing, the history of international law is still in search of a proper methodology. Two cultures of writing history compete in its making: ‘historians’ histories’ and ‘jurists’ histories’. While legal historians are interested in the past for its own sake and put it in context, lawyers tend to be interested in the past for the light it throws on the present. Several questions arise in this context. Should one stick to intra-disciplinary approaches, or endorse a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary stance, enabling international lawyers and legal historians to work together in mapping the history of international law? This article has an exploratory character and aims to address these questions investigating the converging divergences of the two cultures of writing the histories of international law.
KW - history of international law
KW - international law
KW - legal history
KW - culture
KW - methodology
M3 - Journal article
VL - 58
SP - 311
EP - 352
JO - Harvard International Law Journal
JF - Harvard International Law Journal
SN - 0017-8063
IS - 2
ER -