Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequ...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. / Healy, Geraldine; Bradley, Harriet; Forson, C.
In: Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 18, No. 5, 30.09.2011, p. 467-487.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Healy, G, Bradley, H & Forson, C 2011, 'Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations', Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x

APA

Healy, G., Bradley, H., & Forson, C. (2011). Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x

Vancouver

Healy G, Bradley H, Forson C. Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work and Organization. 2011 Sept 30;18(5):467-487. Epub 2011 Apr 13. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x

Author

Healy, Geraldine ; Bradley, Harriet ; Forson, C. / Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. In: Gender, Work and Organization. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 467-487.

Bibtex

@article{53dcc3f1c655495582bee8668ccfc2a2,
title = "Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations",
abstract = "Using Acker's conceptual framework of inequality regimes, this article explores the experiences of Bangladeshi, Caribbean and Pakistani women working in three parts of the public sector: health, local government and higher education. Our concern is to investigate how inequality regimes are sustained, despite the existence in the public sector of more sophisticated policy development and stronger legal duties than in the private sector. Drawing on interviews with managers and with women employees, the study demonstrates the complexity and unevenness in the way inequality regimes are produced, reproduced and rationalized. Utilising what Crenshaw calls an {\textquoteleft}intersectional sensibility{\textquoteright} helps reveal the persistence of intersectional inequalities in organizations explicitly committed to challenging inequality regimes.",
author = "Geraldine Healy and Harriet Bradley and C. Forson",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "467--487",
journal = "Gender, Work and Organization",
issn = "0968-6673",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations

AU - Healy, Geraldine

AU - Bradley, Harriet

AU - Forson, C.

PY - 2011/9/30

Y1 - 2011/9/30

N2 - Using Acker's conceptual framework of inequality regimes, this article explores the experiences of Bangladeshi, Caribbean and Pakistani women working in three parts of the public sector: health, local government and higher education. Our concern is to investigate how inequality regimes are sustained, despite the existence in the public sector of more sophisticated policy development and stronger legal duties than in the private sector. Drawing on interviews with managers and with women employees, the study demonstrates the complexity and unevenness in the way inequality regimes are produced, reproduced and rationalized. Utilising what Crenshaw calls an ‘intersectional sensibility’ helps reveal the persistence of intersectional inequalities in organizations explicitly committed to challenging inequality regimes.

AB - Using Acker's conceptual framework of inequality regimes, this article explores the experiences of Bangladeshi, Caribbean and Pakistani women working in three parts of the public sector: health, local government and higher education. Our concern is to investigate how inequality regimes are sustained, despite the existence in the public sector of more sophisticated policy development and stronger legal duties than in the private sector. Drawing on interviews with managers and with women employees, the study demonstrates the complexity and unevenness in the way inequality regimes are produced, reproduced and rationalized. Utilising what Crenshaw calls an ‘intersectional sensibility’ helps reveal the persistence of intersectional inequalities in organizations explicitly committed to challenging inequality regimes.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 467

EP - 487

JO - Gender, Work and Organization

JF - Gender, Work and Organization

SN - 0968-6673

IS - 5

ER -