Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to s...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to study human-animal interaction in historical context: Street dogs in Late Ottoman period

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to study human-animal interaction in historical context: Street dogs in Late Ottoman period. / Taşdizen, Burak; Yetiş, Erman Örsan; Bakırlıoğlu, Yekta.
In: Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 9, 1389010, 19.06.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Taşdizen B, Yetiş EÖ, Bakırlıoğlu Y. Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to study human-animal interaction in historical context: Street dogs in Late Ottoman period. Frontiers in Sociology. 2024 Jun 19;9:1389010. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1389010

Author

Bibtex

@article{b10a37247d2b408b836f5a7ddd5153c1,
title = "Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to study human-animal interaction in historical context: Street dogs in Late Ottoman period",
abstract = "Human knowledge pertaining to human-animal interaction is constructed by the human author, albeit the presence of animal subjects. Such a human lens is pronounced when studying human-animal interactions across history, whose nonhuman animal subjects are not only absent, and therefore eliminating the possibility of conducting empirical studies in situ, but also their experiences are filtered by the interpretative lens of human authors of extant historical accounts as well as contemporary human analysts who interpret these accounts. This article draws upon such epistemological limitations of understanding nonhuman animal presence in historical accounts and offers human-animal intersubjectivity as an analytical concept, involving generative iterability and indistinctive boundaries that emphasise intersubjective openness and relationality, to trace and disclose the continuity of human-animal co-existence. The article's historical scope is the Late Ottoman period characterised by a sense of temporal and spatial disorientation and reorientation for humans as well as street dogs during its modernisation processes. ",
author = "Burak Ta{\c s}dizen and Yeti{\c s}, {Erman {\"O}rsan} and Yekta Bakırlıoğlu",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "19",
doi = "10.3389/fsoc.2024.1389010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Sociology",
issn = "2297-7775",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intersubjectivity as an analytical concept to study human-animal interaction in historical context

T2 - Street dogs in Late Ottoman period

AU - Taşdizen, Burak

AU - Yetiş, Erman Örsan

AU - Bakırlıoğlu, Yekta

PY - 2024/6/19

Y1 - 2024/6/19

N2 - Human knowledge pertaining to human-animal interaction is constructed by the human author, albeit the presence of animal subjects. Such a human lens is pronounced when studying human-animal interactions across history, whose nonhuman animal subjects are not only absent, and therefore eliminating the possibility of conducting empirical studies in situ, but also their experiences are filtered by the interpretative lens of human authors of extant historical accounts as well as contemporary human analysts who interpret these accounts. This article draws upon such epistemological limitations of understanding nonhuman animal presence in historical accounts and offers human-animal intersubjectivity as an analytical concept, involving generative iterability and indistinctive boundaries that emphasise intersubjective openness and relationality, to trace and disclose the continuity of human-animal co-existence. The article's historical scope is the Late Ottoman period characterised by a sense of temporal and spatial disorientation and reorientation for humans as well as street dogs during its modernisation processes.

AB - Human knowledge pertaining to human-animal interaction is constructed by the human author, albeit the presence of animal subjects. Such a human lens is pronounced when studying human-animal interactions across history, whose nonhuman animal subjects are not only absent, and therefore eliminating the possibility of conducting empirical studies in situ, but also their experiences are filtered by the interpretative lens of human authors of extant historical accounts as well as contemporary human analysts who interpret these accounts. This article draws upon such epistemological limitations of understanding nonhuman animal presence in historical accounts and offers human-animal intersubjectivity as an analytical concept, involving generative iterability and indistinctive boundaries that emphasise intersubjective openness and relationality, to trace and disclose the continuity of human-animal co-existence. The article's historical scope is the Late Ottoman period characterised by a sense of temporal and spatial disorientation and reorientation for humans as well as street dogs during its modernisation processes.

U2 - 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1389010

DO - 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1389010

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38962562

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Sociology

JF - Frontiers in Sociology

SN - 2297-7775

M1 - 1389010

ER -