Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four fu...
View graph of relations

Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women. / Dewhurst, Susan; Bampouras, Theodoros M.
In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 93, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 703-707.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Dewhurst, S & Bampouras, TM 2014, 'Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women', American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 703-707. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000078

APA

Vancouver

Dewhurst S, Bampouras TM. Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;93(8):703-707. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000078

Author

Dewhurst, Susan ; Bampouras, Theodoros M. / Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Vol. 93, No. 8. pp. 703-707.

Bibtex

@article{f1b985d882d4422f950b8a27fd97c2bc,
title = "Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women",
abstract = "Functional tests are commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of older individuals; however, intraday reliability and sensitivity are required to enable informed decisions on whether repeated trials are necessary and to ensure that the values obtained from a single session are a patient's true score. This study aimed to investigate the intraday reliability and sensitivity of four commonly used functional tests in older individuals. Seventy-one healthy older women (mean [SD]: age, 71.7 [7.3] yrs; body mass, 64.8 [10.2] kg; stature, 1.58 [0.07] m) performed the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests three times in one single session, with 1 min between trials. Reliability between all trials was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient, and sensitivity was examined using typical error. All tests were highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.89-0.99), indicating no need for a familiarization trial. Typical error between trials 2 and 1 were 0.06 m·s, 0.42 s, 1.13 cm, 0.92 cm for the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests, respectively. Practitioners should perform two trials to examine whether the difference between them is less than the typical error reported here. These results should help practitioners ensure that scores obtained from an individual from these functional tests are a true reflection of their functional ability rather than measurement error.",
keywords = "Functional Ability Tests, Neuromuscular Performance, Test-Retest, Typical Error",
author = "Susan Dewhurst and Bampouras, {Theodoros M.}",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0000000000000078",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "703--707",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraday reliability and sensitivity of four functional ability tests in older women

AU - Dewhurst, Susan

AU - Bampouras, Theodoros M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Functional tests are commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of older individuals; however, intraday reliability and sensitivity are required to enable informed decisions on whether repeated trials are necessary and to ensure that the values obtained from a single session are a patient's true score. This study aimed to investigate the intraday reliability and sensitivity of four commonly used functional tests in older individuals. Seventy-one healthy older women (mean [SD]: age, 71.7 [7.3] yrs; body mass, 64.8 [10.2] kg; stature, 1.58 [0.07] m) performed the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests three times in one single session, with 1 min between trials. Reliability between all trials was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient, and sensitivity was examined using typical error. All tests were highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.89-0.99), indicating no need for a familiarization trial. Typical error between trials 2 and 1 were 0.06 m·s, 0.42 s, 1.13 cm, 0.92 cm for the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests, respectively. Practitioners should perform two trials to examine whether the difference between them is less than the typical error reported here. These results should help practitioners ensure that scores obtained from an individual from these functional tests are a true reflection of their functional ability rather than measurement error.

AB - Functional tests are commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of older individuals; however, intraday reliability and sensitivity are required to enable informed decisions on whether repeated trials are necessary and to ensure that the values obtained from a single session are a patient's true score. This study aimed to investigate the intraday reliability and sensitivity of four commonly used functional tests in older individuals. Seventy-one healthy older women (mean [SD]: age, 71.7 [7.3] yrs; body mass, 64.8 [10.2] kg; stature, 1.58 [0.07] m) performed the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests three times in one single session, with 1 min between trials. Reliability between all trials was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient, and sensitivity was examined using typical error. All tests were highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.89-0.99), indicating no need for a familiarization trial. Typical error between trials 2 and 1 were 0.06 m·s, 0.42 s, 1.13 cm, 0.92 cm for the 6-m maximum walking speed, timed 8-foot up-and-go, chair sit-and-reach, and back scratch tests, respectively. Practitioners should perform two trials to examine whether the difference between them is less than the typical error reported here. These results should help practitioners ensure that scores obtained from an individual from these functional tests are a true reflection of their functional ability rather than measurement error.

KW - Functional Ability Tests

KW - Neuromuscular Performance

KW - Test-Retest

KW - Typical Error

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000078

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000078

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24658430

AN - SCOPUS:84905010224

VL - 93

SP - 703

EP - 707

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 8

ER -