Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Introduction
AU - Ruston, Sharon
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2013, Sharon Ruston.
PY - 2013/5/29
Y1 - 2013/5/29
N2 - In a notebook kept around the time that he worked on his safety lamp (circa 1815), the invention that would be praised for the countless lives it saved in British mines, Humphry Davy writes the following: Those brilliant and poetical works in which enthusiasm takes place of reason, and in which the human intellect exhausts itself, as it were, in imagination and feeling, resemble monstrous flowers, brilliant and odorous, but affording no materials of re-production(Collected Works, I, 212)1 He is writing of a particular kind of poetry here perhaps, rather than poetry in general, but there is further evidence in the notebooks for Davy’s coming to distinguish between poetry and science in these ways.2 For example, comparing Shakespeare to Bacon and Milton to Newton around 1805, Davy writes: ‘The object of poetry, whatever may be said by poets, is more to amuse than to instruct; the object of science more to instruct than amuse’ (Collected Works, I, 147). It is important to keep in mind the fact that, notwithstanding such views, Davy himself wrote poetry throughout his life, but it does seem that he valued chemistry more highly for these reasons.
AB - In a notebook kept around the time that he worked on his safety lamp (circa 1815), the invention that would be praised for the countless lives it saved in British mines, Humphry Davy writes the following: Those brilliant and poetical works in which enthusiasm takes place of reason, and in which the human intellect exhausts itself, as it were, in imagination and feeling, resemble monstrous flowers, brilliant and odorous, but affording no materials of re-production(Collected Works, I, 212)1 He is writing of a particular kind of poetry here perhaps, rather than poetry in general, but there is further evidence in the notebooks for Davy’s coming to distinguish between poetry and science in these ways.2 For example, comparing Shakespeare to Bacon and Milton to Newton around 1805, Davy writes: ‘The object of poetry, whatever may be said by poets, is more to amuse than to instruct; the object of science more to instruct than amuse’ (Collected Works, I, 147). It is important to keep in mind the fact that, notwithstanding such views, Davy himself wrote poetry throughout his life, but it does seem that he valued chemistry more highly for these reasons.
KW - Deep Passion
KW - Literary Creation
KW - Literary Metaphor
KW - Prose Work
KW - Romantic Period
U2 - 10.1057/9781137264299_1
DO - 10.1057/9781137264299_1
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85146094545
SN - 9781349442959
T3 - Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print
SP - 1
EP - 27
BT - Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
CY - London
ER -