Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intuition as a “trained thing”

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Intuition as a “trained thing”: sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Intuition as a “trained thing”: sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures. / Pedwell, Carolyn.
In: Subjectivity, Vol. 30, 31.12.2023, p. 348-372.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pedwell C. Intuition as a “trained thing”: sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures. Subjectivity. 2023 Dec 31;30:348-372. Epub 2023 Oct 27. doi: 10.1057/s41286-023-00170-x

Author

Bibtex

@article{f2339fd18f6049a9bec93fbd8bc05ed8,
title = "Intuition as a “trained thing”: sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures",
abstract = "What happens when intuition becomes algorithmic? This article explores how approaching intuition as recursively trained sheds light on what is at stake affectively, politically, and ethically in the entanglements of sensorial, cognitive, computational and corporate processes and (infra)structures that characterise algorithmic life. Bringing affect theory and speculative philosophies to bear on computational histories and cultures, I tease out the continuing implications of post-war efforts to make intuition a measurable and indexable mode of anticipatory knowledge. If digital computing pioneers tended to elide the more ambivalent implications of quantifying intuition, this article asks what computational myths are at play in current accounts of machine learning-enabled sensing, thinking, and speculating and what complexities or chaos are disavowed. I argue that an understanding of more-than-human intuition which grapples meaningfully with the indeterminacy central to digitally mediated social life must recognise that visceral response is recursively trained in multiple ways with diverse, and often contradictory, effects.",
author = "Carolyn Pedwell",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1057/s41286-023-00170-x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "348--372",
journal = "Subjectivity",
issn = "1755-6341",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intuition as a “trained thing”

T2 - sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures

AU - Pedwell, Carolyn

PY - 2023/12/31

Y1 - 2023/12/31

N2 - What happens when intuition becomes algorithmic? This article explores how approaching intuition as recursively trained sheds light on what is at stake affectively, politically, and ethically in the entanglements of sensorial, cognitive, computational and corporate processes and (infra)structures that characterise algorithmic life. Bringing affect theory and speculative philosophies to bear on computational histories and cultures, I tease out the continuing implications of post-war efforts to make intuition a measurable and indexable mode of anticipatory knowledge. If digital computing pioneers tended to elide the more ambivalent implications of quantifying intuition, this article asks what computational myths are at play in current accounts of machine learning-enabled sensing, thinking, and speculating and what complexities or chaos are disavowed. I argue that an understanding of more-than-human intuition which grapples meaningfully with the indeterminacy central to digitally mediated social life must recognise that visceral response is recursively trained in multiple ways with diverse, and often contradictory, effects.

AB - What happens when intuition becomes algorithmic? This article explores how approaching intuition as recursively trained sheds light on what is at stake affectively, politically, and ethically in the entanglements of sensorial, cognitive, computational and corporate processes and (infra)structures that characterise algorithmic life. Bringing affect theory and speculative philosophies to bear on computational histories and cultures, I tease out the continuing implications of post-war efforts to make intuition a measurable and indexable mode of anticipatory knowledge. If digital computing pioneers tended to elide the more ambivalent implications of quantifying intuition, this article asks what computational myths are at play in current accounts of machine learning-enabled sensing, thinking, and speculating and what complexities or chaos are disavowed. I argue that an understanding of more-than-human intuition which grapples meaningfully with the indeterminacy central to digitally mediated social life must recognise that visceral response is recursively trained in multiple ways with diverse, and often contradictory, effects.

U2 - 10.1057/s41286-023-00170-x

DO - 10.1057/s41286-023-00170-x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 348

EP - 372

JO - Subjectivity

JF - Subjectivity

SN - 1755-6341

ER -