Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intuition's value for organizational innovativeness and why managers still refrain from using it
AU - Matzler, Kurt
AU - Uzelac, Borislav
AU - Bauer, Florian
PY - 2014/5/13
Y1 - 2014/5/13
N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to expand the knowledge about the value of intuition for organizational innovativeness and organizational factors inhibiting intuitive decision making. Design/methodology/approach - The study develops and tests a theoretical model that relates intuitive and deliberate decision-making styles to organizational innovativeness, and the application of either decision-making style to organizational size and decision maker's power position in an organization. Based on a survey conducted in 2011, data from 281 organizations was analyzed applying linear regression analysis. Findings - Intuitive and deliberate processing both relate positively to organizational innovativeness. Organizational size relates negatively to the application of an intuitive decision-making style, while power position relates positively to the application of an intuitive decision-making style. Research limitations/implications - The findings suggest that intuitive decision making is valuable for organizational innovativeness. Still, its application is suppressed if decision makers are in lower power positions or part of larger organizations. Originality/value - High demands on managers' and entrepreneurs' information processing capabilities require them to apply their full range of cognitive capabilities (i.e. deliberative and intuitive processing). Intuitive decision making, however, still seems to be confined to those who have least reason to fear critique from others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved). (journal abstract)
AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to expand the knowledge about the value of intuition for organizational innovativeness and organizational factors inhibiting intuitive decision making. Design/methodology/approach - The study develops and tests a theoretical model that relates intuitive and deliberate decision-making styles to organizational innovativeness, and the application of either decision-making style to organizational size and decision maker's power position in an organization. Based on a survey conducted in 2011, data from 281 organizations was analyzed applying linear regression analysis. Findings - Intuitive and deliberate processing both relate positively to organizational innovativeness. Organizational size relates negatively to the application of an intuitive decision-making style, while power position relates positively to the application of an intuitive decision-making style. Research limitations/implications - The findings suggest that intuitive decision making is valuable for organizational innovativeness. Still, its application is suppressed if decision makers are in lower power positions or part of larger organizations. Originality/value - High demands on managers' and entrepreneurs' information processing capabilities require them to apply their full range of cognitive capabilities (i.e. deliberative and intuitive processing). Intuitive decision making, however, still seems to be confined to those who have least reason to fear critique from others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved). (journal abstract)
KW - Innovation
KW - Decision making
KW - Intuition
U2 - 10.1108/MD-08-2013-0404
DO - 10.1108/MD-08-2013-0404
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 1651359197
VL - 52
SP - 526
EP - 539
JO - Management Decision
JF - Management Decision
SN - 0025-1747
IS - 3
ER -