Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intuitive and Reliable Estimates of the Output Gap

Electronic data

  • REStat

    Rights statement: This is a postprint, or accepted manuscript version and that the article has been accepted for publication in The Review of Economics and Statistics.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.99 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Intuitive and Reliable Estimates of the Output Gap

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/07/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>The Review of Economics and Statistics
Issue number3
Volume100
Number of pages16
Pages (from-to)550-566
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date9/07/18
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The Beveridge-Nelson decomposition based on autoregressive models produces estimates of the output gap that are strongly at odds with widely held beliefs about transitory movements in economic activity. This is due to parameter estimates implying a high signal-to-noise ratio in terms of the variance of trend shocks as a fraction of the overall forecast error variance. When we impose a lower signal-to-noise ratio, the resulting Beveridge-Nelson filter produces a more intuitive estimate of the output gap that is large in amplitude and highly persistent, and it typically increases in expansions and decreases in recessions. Notably, our approach is also reliable in the sense of being subject to smaller revisions and predicting future output growth and inflation better than other trend-cycle decompositions that impose a low signal-to-noise ratio.

Bibliographic note

This is a postprint, or accepted manuscript version and that the article has been accepted for publication in The Review of Economics and Statistics.