Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation. / Morley, James; Singh, Aarti.
In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 48, No. 4, 06.2016, p. 699-728.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Morley, J & Singh, A 2016, 'Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation', Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 699-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12315

APA

Morley, J., & Singh, A. (2016). Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(4), 699-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12315

Vancouver

Morley J, Singh A. Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2016 Jun;48(4):699-728. Epub 2016 May 17. doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12315

Author

Morley, James ; Singh, Aarti. / Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation. In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 699-728.

Bibtex

@article{cb2f41bbb3054971b92035ac9764d0b1,
title = "Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation",
abstract = "Why did the volatility of U.S. real GDP decline by more than the volatility of final sales with the Great Moderation in the mid‐1980s? One explanation is that firms shifted their inventory behavior toward a greater emphasis on production smoothing. We investigate the role of inventories in the Great Moderation by estimating an unobserved components model that identifies inventory and sales shocks and their propagation in the aggregate data. Our estimates provide no support for increased production smoothing. Instead, smaller transitory inventory shocks are responsible for the excess volatility reduction in output compared to sales. These shocks behave like informational errors related to production that must be set in advance and their reduction also helps explain the changed forecasting role of inventories since the mid‐1980s. Our findings provide an optimistic prognosis for a continuation of the Great Moderation, despite the dramatic movements in output during the recent economic crisis.",
keywords = "E22, E32, C32, Great Moderation, Inventories, Production smoothing, Unobserved Componens Model",
author = "James Morley and Aarti Singh",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/jmcb.12315",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "699--728",
journal = "Journal of Money, Credit and Banking",
issn = "0022-2879",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inventory Shocks and the Great Moderation

AU - Morley, James

AU - Singh, Aarti

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Why did the volatility of U.S. real GDP decline by more than the volatility of final sales with the Great Moderation in the mid‐1980s? One explanation is that firms shifted their inventory behavior toward a greater emphasis on production smoothing. We investigate the role of inventories in the Great Moderation by estimating an unobserved components model that identifies inventory and sales shocks and their propagation in the aggregate data. Our estimates provide no support for increased production smoothing. Instead, smaller transitory inventory shocks are responsible for the excess volatility reduction in output compared to sales. These shocks behave like informational errors related to production that must be set in advance and their reduction also helps explain the changed forecasting role of inventories since the mid‐1980s. Our findings provide an optimistic prognosis for a continuation of the Great Moderation, despite the dramatic movements in output during the recent economic crisis.

AB - Why did the volatility of U.S. real GDP decline by more than the volatility of final sales with the Great Moderation in the mid‐1980s? One explanation is that firms shifted their inventory behavior toward a greater emphasis on production smoothing. We investigate the role of inventories in the Great Moderation by estimating an unobserved components model that identifies inventory and sales shocks and their propagation in the aggregate data. Our estimates provide no support for increased production smoothing. Instead, smaller transitory inventory shocks are responsible for the excess volatility reduction in output compared to sales. These shocks behave like informational errors related to production that must be set in advance and their reduction also helps explain the changed forecasting role of inventories since the mid‐1980s. Our findings provide an optimistic prognosis for a continuation of the Great Moderation, despite the dramatic movements in output during the recent economic crisis.

KW - E22, E32, C32, Great Moderation, Inventories, Production smoothing, Unobserved Componens Model

U2 - 10.1111/jmcb.12315

DO - 10.1111/jmcb.12315

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 699

EP - 728

JO - Journal of Money, Credit and Banking

JF - Journal of Money, Credit and Banking

SN - 0022-2879

IS - 4

ER -