Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Is my Organization “good” or “bad”?
View graph of relations

Is my Organization “good” or “bad”?: An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Is my Organization “good” or “bad”? An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism. / Martin, Felix; Secchi, Davide.
2024. Paper presented at Society of Business Ethics, Chicago, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Martin, F & Secchi, D 2024, 'Is my Organization “good” or “bad”? An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism', Paper presented at Society of Business Ethics, Chicago, United States, 8/08/24 - 11/08/24.

APA

Martin, F., & Secchi, D. (in press). Is my Organization “good” or “bad”? An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism. Paper presented at Society of Business Ethics, Chicago, United States.

Vancouver

Martin F, Secchi D. Is my Organization “good” or “bad”? An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism. 2024. Paper presented at Society of Business Ethics, Chicago, United States.

Author

Martin, Felix ; Secchi, Davide. / Is my Organization “good” or “bad”? An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism. Paper presented at Society of Business Ethics, Chicago, United States.

Bibtex

@conference{7c282ed569d34e5282ed75b65891fda2,
title = "Is my Organization “good” or “bad”?: An Examination of Ethical Organizational Anthropomorphism",
abstract = "Organizational anthropomorphism increases organizational resilience by strengthening relations with employees and promoting stronger organizational identification. Organizational anthropomorphism thus offers a valuable lens to understand how organizations develop and maintain their identities in the face of change, automation, and lack of meaning. Yet, organizational anthropomorphism can be misleading due to its visceral nature and its association with biased forms of identification. We define ethical organizational anthropomorphism (“ethical OA”) and explore its “believability” by drawing from research on organizational legitimacy, organizational virtuousness, organizational overidentification, and organizational identity orientation. We adopt a contingency lens by examining the believability, quality, and quantity, of organizational anthropomorphism along with the instability–stability continuum of market competition and the three organizational identity types. anthropomorphism helps shape organizational identities in the face of external and internal change.",
author = "Felix Martin and Davide Secchi",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "4",
language = "English",
note = "Society of Business Ethics, SBE ; Conference date: 08-08-2024 Through 11-08-2024",
url = "https://sbeonline.org/conference/2024-annual-conference/",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Is my Organization “good” or “bad”?

T2 - Society of Business Ethics

AU - Martin, Felix

AU - Secchi, Davide

PY - 2024/6/4

Y1 - 2024/6/4

N2 - Organizational anthropomorphism increases organizational resilience by strengthening relations with employees and promoting stronger organizational identification. Organizational anthropomorphism thus offers a valuable lens to understand how organizations develop and maintain their identities in the face of change, automation, and lack of meaning. Yet, organizational anthropomorphism can be misleading due to its visceral nature and its association with biased forms of identification. We define ethical organizational anthropomorphism (“ethical OA”) and explore its “believability” by drawing from research on organizational legitimacy, organizational virtuousness, organizational overidentification, and organizational identity orientation. We adopt a contingency lens by examining the believability, quality, and quantity, of organizational anthropomorphism along with the instability–stability continuum of market competition and the three organizational identity types. anthropomorphism helps shape organizational identities in the face of external and internal change.

AB - Organizational anthropomorphism increases organizational resilience by strengthening relations with employees and promoting stronger organizational identification. Organizational anthropomorphism thus offers a valuable lens to understand how organizations develop and maintain their identities in the face of change, automation, and lack of meaning. Yet, organizational anthropomorphism can be misleading due to its visceral nature and its association with biased forms of identification. We define ethical organizational anthropomorphism (“ethical OA”) and explore its “believability” by drawing from research on organizational legitimacy, organizational virtuousness, organizational overidentification, and organizational identity orientation. We adopt a contingency lens by examining the believability, quality, and quantity, of organizational anthropomorphism along with the instability–stability continuum of market competition and the three organizational identity types. anthropomorphism helps shape organizational identities in the face of external and internal change.

M3 - Conference paper

Y2 - 8 August 2024 through 11 August 2024

ER -