Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in O...
View graph of relations

It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors. / Arai, L.; Roen, K.; Roberts, H. et al.
In: Injury Prevention, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.06.2005, p. 148-151.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{23843c73953e4a358d467bd9eaf98612,
title = "It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors",
abstract = "Objective: To explore data on factors affecting implementation processes in papers contributing to a Cochrane systematic review (SR) of smoke alarm interventions, supplemented by further papers not included in the review. Design: Screening for data on implementation on the basis of: (1) primary studies included in a Cochrane SR, (2) further papers relating to these and similar studies, and (3) approaches to authors of these and other relevant studies and reports. Results: Relatively few data were found to help people seeking to implement smoke alarm promotion interventions. Conclusions: For practitioners and policymakers to be able to build on research evidence, researchers and journal editors need to ensure that sufficient data are published, or are otherwise available to interested parties to move from understanding the evidence to using it.",
author = "L. Arai and K. Roen and H. Roberts and J. Popay",
year = "2005",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/ip.2004.007336",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "148--151",
journal = "Injury Prevention",
issn = "1353-8047",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors

AU - Arai, L.

AU - Roen, K.

AU - Roberts, H.

AU - Popay, J.

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - Objective: To explore data on factors affecting implementation processes in papers contributing to a Cochrane systematic review (SR) of smoke alarm interventions, supplemented by further papers not included in the review. Design: Screening for data on implementation on the basis of: (1) primary studies included in a Cochrane SR, (2) further papers relating to these and similar studies, and (3) approaches to authors of these and other relevant studies and reports. Results: Relatively few data were found to help people seeking to implement smoke alarm promotion interventions. Conclusions: For practitioners and policymakers to be able to build on research evidence, researchers and journal editors need to ensure that sufficient data are published, or are otherwise available to interested parties to move from understanding the evidence to using it.

AB - Objective: To explore data on factors affecting implementation processes in papers contributing to a Cochrane systematic review (SR) of smoke alarm interventions, supplemented by further papers not included in the review. Design: Screening for data on implementation on the basis of: (1) primary studies included in a Cochrane SR, (2) further papers relating to these and similar studies, and (3) approaches to authors of these and other relevant studies and reports. Results: Relatively few data were found to help people seeking to implement smoke alarm promotion interventions. Conclusions: For practitioners and policymakers to be able to build on research evidence, researchers and journal editors need to ensure that sufficient data are published, or are otherwise available to interested parties to move from understanding the evidence to using it.

U2 - 10.1136/ip.2004.007336

DO - 10.1136/ip.2004.007336

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15933405

AN - SCOPUS:20444447539

VL - 11

SP - 148

EP - 151

JO - Injury Prevention

JF - Injury Prevention

SN - 1353-8047

IS - 3

ER -