Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > 'It's like we are not human'

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

'It's like we are not human': discourses of humanisation and otherness in the representation of trans identity in British broadsheet newspapers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

'It's like we are not human': discourses of humanisation and otherness in the representation of trans identity in British broadsheet newspapers. / Montiel Mccann, Camila.
In: Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 23, No. 6, 18.08.2023, p. 2962-2978.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Montiel Mccann C. 'It's like we are not human': discourses of humanisation and otherness in the representation of trans identity in British broadsheet newspapers. Feminist Media Studies. 2023 Aug 18;23(6):2962-2978. Epub 2022 Jul 14. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2022.2097727

Author

Bibtex

@article{bab2d1009ca24a95b95607db82422826,
title = "'It's like we are not human': discourses of humanisation and otherness in the representation of trans identity in British broadsheet newspapers",
abstract = "This paper examines how transgender identity is represented across articles from three British national newspapers: The Guardian, The Times and The Telegraph. Transgender identity has become a highly contentious issue in areas of western culture, especially Britain, and even within feminism itself, with heightened visibility leading to a backlash against the rights of trans people to protection, and even recognition, in law. However, the influence of the broadsheets, Britain{\textquoteright}s so-called “quality” newspapers, in shaping the debate over transgender rights is under-researched. Using feminist critical discourse analysis (Michelle), I assess how the above newspapers position transgender subjects to alternatively legitimize or “other” transgender identity. Despite polarisation on issues of trans rights between newspapers, this paper finds that both “pro-trans” and “anti-trans” articles appropriate a feminist lexicon to define womanhood and gender in ways that justify their stance and foster division within wider society. I conclude that (white, cisheteronormative) feminism has become a vehicle for mainstream news media to further political agendas that can be crudely cast as either “progressive” or “conservative”.",
keywords = "Transgender, identity, feminist critical discourse analysis, news media, hegemonic femininity",
author = "{Montiel Mccann}, Camila",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/14680777.2022.2097727",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2962--2978",
journal = "Feminist Media Studies",
issn = "1468-0777",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'It's like we are not human'

T2 - discourses of humanisation and otherness in the representation of trans identity in British broadsheet newspapers

AU - Montiel Mccann, Camila

PY - 2023/8/18

Y1 - 2023/8/18

N2 - This paper examines how transgender identity is represented across articles from three British national newspapers: The Guardian, The Times and The Telegraph. Transgender identity has become a highly contentious issue in areas of western culture, especially Britain, and even within feminism itself, with heightened visibility leading to a backlash against the rights of trans people to protection, and even recognition, in law. However, the influence of the broadsheets, Britain’s so-called “quality” newspapers, in shaping the debate over transgender rights is under-researched. Using feminist critical discourse analysis (Michelle), I assess how the above newspapers position transgender subjects to alternatively legitimize or “other” transgender identity. Despite polarisation on issues of trans rights between newspapers, this paper finds that both “pro-trans” and “anti-trans” articles appropriate a feminist lexicon to define womanhood and gender in ways that justify their stance and foster division within wider society. I conclude that (white, cisheteronormative) feminism has become a vehicle for mainstream news media to further political agendas that can be crudely cast as either “progressive” or “conservative”.

AB - This paper examines how transgender identity is represented across articles from three British national newspapers: The Guardian, The Times and The Telegraph. Transgender identity has become a highly contentious issue in areas of western culture, especially Britain, and even within feminism itself, with heightened visibility leading to a backlash against the rights of trans people to protection, and even recognition, in law. However, the influence of the broadsheets, Britain’s so-called “quality” newspapers, in shaping the debate over transgender rights is under-researched. Using feminist critical discourse analysis (Michelle), I assess how the above newspapers position transgender subjects to alternatively legitimize or “other” transgender identity. Despite polarisation on issues of trans rights between newspapers, this paper finds that both “pro-trans” and “anti-trans” articles appropriate a feminist lexicon to define womanhood and gender in ways that justify their stance and foster division within wider society. I conclude that (white, cisheteronormative) feminism has become a vehicle for mainstream news media to further political agendas that can be crudely cast as either “progressive” or “conservative”.

KW - Transgender

KW - identity

KW - feminist critical discourse analysis

KW - news media

KW - hegemonic femininity

U2 - 10.1080/14680777.2022.2097727

DO - 10.1080/14680777.2022.2097727

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 2962

EP - 2978

JO - Feminist Media Studies

JF - Feminist Media Studies

SN - 1468-0777

IS - 6

ER -