Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - It's not phonetic aesthetics that drives dialect preference
T2 - the case of Swiss German
AU - Leemann, Adrian
AU - Kolly, Marie-José
AU - Nolan, Francis
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Dialect stereotypes are widespread. Birmingham English is perceived as ugly, Parisian French ascultivated. In Switzerland, Bern and Thurgau Swiss German lie on opposite ends of the attractiveness spectrum. In the present study, we examined how Swiss German, French, and English listeners – the latter two being unfamiliar with the dialects – rated the phonetic aesthetics of these two Swiss German dialects. In a matched-guise design, listeners judged how pleasing stimuli read by a bidialectal speaker were. Results revealed that unfamiliar listeners didnot show a preference while familiar listeners strongly preferred Bern Swiss German. Theattractiveness of a dialect thus seems to be largely driven by the social attributes of its speakers and less so by its phonetic aesthetics. The realization of /r/ as apical or dorsal, however, strongly influenced preference judgments in familiar listeners
AB - Dialect stereotypes are widespread. Birmingham English is perceived as ugly, Parisian French ascultivated. In Switzerland, Bern and Thurgau Swiss German lie on opposite ends of the attractiveness spectrum. In the present study, we examined how Swiss German, French, and English listeners – the latter two being unfamiliar with the dialects – rated the phonetic aesthetics of these two Swiss German dialects. In a matched-guise design, listeners judged how pleasing stimuli read by a bidialectal speaker were. Results revealed that unfamiliar listeners didnot show a preference while familiar listeners strongly preferred Bern Swiss German. Theattractiveness of a dialect thus seems to be largely driven by the social attributes of its speakers and less so by its phonetic aesthetics. The realization of /r/ as apical or dorsal, however, strongly influenced preference judgments in familiar listeners
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
BT - Proceedings of ICPhS 2015
ER -