Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leadership, 16 (2), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Leadership page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/LEA on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 307 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
<mark>Journal publication date</mark> | 1/04/2020 |
---|---|
<mark>Journal</mark> | Leadership |
Issue number | 2 |
Volume | 16 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Pages (from-to) | 141-162 |
Publication Status | Published |
Early online date | 29/09/19 |
<mark>Original language</mark> | English |
This research explores the relationship between participation in leadership development programmes and disengagement from the employing organization. Based on repeated interviews with 10 managers participating in an open leadership development programme, our analysis shows that half of the participants reflected a sense of distancing themselves from how their organizations practiced leadership, and for some, an emotional disengagement with their home organization which we see as analogous to changes in social identity. We problematize the role of management and leadership development programmes with regard to the relationship between organizations and employees. A series of paradoxes are reflected in our critique of this relationship. The most prominent in terms of implications is that a successful management and leadership development programme – recognized by employees and employers – can generate dissatisfaction with the home organization as a consequence of the purpose of the programme: to increase confidence and enhanced agency. This paradox has significant implication to the leadership development industry and we explore these implications.