Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > IWRM in England

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation. / Watson, Nigel.
In: International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol. 30, No. 3, 07.2014, p. 445-459.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Watson, N 2014, 'IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation', International Journal of Water Resources Development, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2014.899892

APA

Vancouver

Watson N. IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2014 Jul;30(3):445-459. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2014.899892

Author

Watson, Nigel. / IWRM in England : bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation. In: International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 445-459.

Bibtex

@article{c15500470f304cb596dc410068400c90,
title = "IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation",
abstract = "Implementation of IWRM has generally been approached mechanistically, with attention focused on identifying necessary conditions and developing useful tools and techniques. In contrast, this article examines alternative approaches to implementation in their totality, using IWRM in England as a case analysis. In England, the EU Water Framework Directive has been implemented through a {\textquoteleft}top-down{\textquoteright} approach but a {\textquoteleft}bottom-up{\textquoteright} approach has been adopted for catchment management. Both the Water Framework Directive and the catchment-based approach are consistent with the goals of IWRM, but their implementation arrangements are disconnected and operate at different scales. This example suggests that cross-scale interplay and bridging institutions are critical to the successful implementation of IWRM in complex governance settings.",
keywords = "IWRM, England, EU Water Framework DiretciveD, catchment-based approach, governance failure, institutional frameworks",
author = "Nigel Watson",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1080/07900627.2014.899892",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "445--459",
journal = "International Journal of Water Resources Development",
issn = "1360-0648",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - IWRM in England

T2 - bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation

AU - Watson, Nigel

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Implementation of IWRM has generally been approached mechanistically, with attention focused on identifying necessary conditions and developing useful tools and techniques. In contrast, this article examines alternative approaches to implementation in their totality, using IWRM in England as a case analysis. In England, the EU Water Framework Directive has been implemented through a ‘top-down’ approach but a ‘bottom-up’ approach has been adopted for catchment management. Both the Water Framework Directive and the catchment-based approach are consistent with the goals of IWRM, but their implementation arrangements are disconnected and operate at different scales. This example suggests that cross-scale interplay and bridging institutions are critical to the successful implementation of IWRM in complex governance settings.

AB - Implementation of IWRM has generally been approached mechanistically, with attention focused on identifying necessary conditions and developing useful tools and techniques. In contrast, this article examines alternative approaches to implementation in their totality, using IWRM in England as a case analysis. In England, the EU Water Framework Directive has been implemented through a ‘top-down’ approach but a ‘bottom-up’ approach has been adopted for catchment management. Both the Water Framework Directive and the catchment-based approach are consistent with the goals of IWRM, but their implementation arrangements are disconnected and operate at different scales. This example suggests that cross-scale interplay and bridging institutions are critical to the successful implementation of IWRM in complex governance settings.

KW - IWRM

KW - England

KW - EU Water Framework DiretciveD

KW - catchment-based approach

KW - governance failure

KW - institutional frameworks

U2 - 10.1080/07900627.2014.899892

DO - 10.1080/07900627.2014.899892

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 445

EP - 459

JO - International Journal of Water Resources Development

JF - International Journal of Water Resources Development

SN - 1360-0648

IS - 3

ER -