Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Joint cognition

Electronic data

  • journal.pone.0151306

    Rights statement: Copyright: © 2016 Towse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Final published version, 986 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Joint cognition: thought contagion and the consequences of cooperation when sharing the task of random sequence generation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Joint cognition: thought contagion and the consequences of cooperation when sharing the task of random sequence generation. / Towse, John Nicholas; Towse, Andrea Sarah; Saito, Satoru et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 3, e0151306, 15.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Towse JN, Towse AS, Saito S, Maehara Y, Miyake A. Joint cognition: thought contagion and the consequences of cooperation when sharing the task of random sequence generation. PLoS ONE. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0151306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151306

Author

Bibtex

@article{a1b549871b13485fa3357cc58e0ba6ba,
title = "Joint cognition: thought contagion and the consequences of cooperation when sharing the task of random sequence generation",
abstract = "Generating random number sequences is a popular psychological task often used to measure executive functioning. We explore random generation under “joint cognition” instructions; pairs of participants take turns to compile a shared response sequence. Across three studies, we point to six key findings from this novel format. First, there are both costs and benefits from group performance. Second, repetition avoidance occurs in dyadic as well as individual production settings. Third, individuals modify their choices in a dyadic situation such that the pair becomes the unit of psychological function. Fourth, there is immediate contagion of sequence stereotypy amongst the pairs (i.e., each contributor “owns” their partner{\textquoteright}s response). Fifth, dyad effects occur even when participants know their partner is not interacting with them (Experiment 2). Sixth, ironically, directing participants{\textquoteright} efforts away from their shared task responsibility can actually benefit conjoint performance (Experiment 3). These results both constrain models of random generation and illuminate processes of joint cognition.",
keywords = "Random sequence generation, Joint cognition, Executive functions, Inhibition",
author = "Towse, {John Nicholas} and Towse, {Andrea Sarah} and Satoru Saito and Yukio Maehara and Akira Miyake",
note = "Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Towse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0151306",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint cognition

T2 - thought contagion and the consequences of cooperation when sharing the task of random sequence generation

AU - Towse, John Nicholas

AU - Towse, Andrea Sarah

AU - Saito, Satoru

AU - Maehara, Yukio

AU - Miyake, Akira

N1 - Copyright: © 2016 Towse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2016/3/15

Y1 - 2016/3/15

N2 - Generating random number sequences is a popular psychological task often used to measure executive functioning. We explore random generation under “joint cognition” instructions; pairs of participants take turns to compile a shared response sequence. Across three studies, we point to six key findings from this novel format. First, there are both costs and benefits from group performance. Second, repetition avoidance occurs in dyadic as well as individual production settings. Third, individuals modify their choices in a dyadic situation such that the pair becomes the unit of psychological function. Fourth, there is immediate contagion of sequence stereotypy amongst the pairs (i.e., each contributor “owns” their partner’s response). Fifth, dyad effects occur even when participants know their partner is not interacting with them (Experiment 2). Sixth, ironically, directing participants’ efforts away from their shared task responsibility can actually benefit conjoint performance (Experiment 3). These results both constrain models of random generation and illuminate processes of joint cognition.

AB - Generating random number sequences is a popular psychological task often used to measure executive functioning. We explore random generation under “joint cognition” instructions; pairs of participants take turns to compile a shared response sequence. Across three studies, we point to six key findings from this novel format. First, there are both costs and benefits from group performance. Second, repetition avoidance occurs in dyadic as well as individual production settings. Third, individuals modify their choices in a dyadic situation such that the pair becomes the unit of psychological function. Fourth, there is immediate contagion of sequence stereotypy amongst the pairs (i.e., each contributor “owns” their partner’s response). Fifth, dyad effects occur even when participants know their partner is not interacting with them (Experiment 2). Sixth, ironically, directing participants’ efforts away from their shared task responsibility can actually benefit conjoint performance (Experiment 3). These results both constrain models of random generation and illuminate processes of joint cognition.

KW - Random sequence generation

KW - Joint cognition

KW - Executive functions

KW - Inhibition

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0151306

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0151306

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0151306

ER -