Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Joint modelling of repeated measurement and tim...
View graph of relations

Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial. / Asar, Özgür; Ritchie, James; Kalra, Philip et al.
In: International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2015, p. 334-344.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Asar, Ö, Ritchie, J, Kalra, P & Diggle, P 2015, 'Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial', International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu262

APA

Asar, Ö., Ritchie, J., Kalra, P., & Diggle, P. (2015). Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(1), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu262

Vancouver

Asar Ö, Ritchie J, Kalra P, Diggle P. Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015;44(1):334-344. Epub 2015 Jan 19. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu262

Author

Asar, Özgür ; Ritchie, James ; Kalra, Philip et al. / Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data : an introductory tutorial. In: International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 334-344.

Bibtex

@article{2b64d8c897184e0eb6e0f6566ed126f1,
title = "Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial",
abstract = "Backgound: The term {\textquoteleft}joint modelling{\textquoteright} is used in the statistical literature to refer to methods for simultaneously analysing longitudinal measurement outcomes, also called repeated measurement data, and time-to-event outcomes, also called survival data. A typical example from nephrology is a study in which the data from each participant consist of repeated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements and time to initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Joint models typically combine linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements and Cox models for censored survival outcomes. Our aim in this paper is to present an introductory tutorial on joint modelling methods, with a case study in nephrology.Methods: We describe the development of the joint modelling framework and compare the results with those obtained by the more widely used approaches of conducting separate analyses of the repeated measurements and survival times based on a linear mixed effects model and a Cox model, respectively. Our case study concerns a data set from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation Study (CRISIS). We also provide details of our open-source software implementation to allow others to replicate and/or modify our analysis.Results: The results for the conventional linear mixed effects model and the longitudinal component of the joint models were found to be similar. However, there were considerable differences between the results for the Cox model with time-varying covariate and the time-to-event component of the joint model. For example, the relationship between kidney function as measured by eGFR and the hazard for initiation of RRT was significantly underestimated by the Cox model that treats eGFR as a time-varying covariate, because the Cox model does not take measurement error in eGFR into account.Conclusions: Joint models should be preferred for simultaneous analyses of repeated measurement and survival data, especially when the former is measured with error and the association between the underlying error-free measurement process and the hazard for survival is of scientific interest.",
keywords = "Chronic kidney disease, cohort study, epidemiology, joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data, measurement error, medical statistics, statistical software",
author = "{\"O}zg{\"u}r Asar and James Ritchie and Philip Kalra and Peter Diggle",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/ije/dyu262",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "334--344",
journal = "International Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0300-5771",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data

T2 - an introductory tutorial

AU - Asar, Özgür

AU - Ritchie, James

AU - Kalra, Philip

AU - Diggle, Peter

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Backgound: The term ‘joint modelling’ is used in the statistical literature to refer to methods for simultaneously analysing longitudinal measurement outcomes, also called repeated measurement data, and time-to-event outcomes, also called survival data. A typical example from nephrology is a study in which the data from each participant consist of repeated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements and time to initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Joint models typically combine linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements and Cox models for censored survival outcomes. Our aim in this paper is to present an introductory tutorial on joint modelling methods, with a case study in nephrology.Methods: We describe the development of the joint modelling framework and compare the results with those obtained by the more widely used approaches of conducting separate analyses of the repeated measurements and survival times based on a linear mixed effects model and a Cox model, respectively. Our case study concerns a data set from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation Study (CRISIS). We also provide details of our open-source software implementation to allow others to replicate and/or modify our analysis.Results: The results for the conventional linear mixed effects model and the longitudinal component of the joint models were found to be similar. However, there were considerable differences between the results for the Cox model with time-varying covariate and the time-to-event component of the joint model. For example, the relationship between kidney function as measured by eGFR and the hazard for initiation of RRT was significantly underestimated by the Cox model that treats eGFR as a time-varying covariate, because the Cox model does not take measurement error in eGFR into account.Conclusions: Joint models should be preferred for simultaneous analyses of repeated measurement and survival data, especially when the former is measured with error and the association between the underlying error-free measurement process and the hazard for survival is of scientific interest.

AB - Backgound: The term ‘joint modelling’ is used in the statistical literature to refer to methods for simultaneously analysing longitudinal measurement outcomes, also called repeated measurement data, and time-to-event outcomes, also called survival data. A typical example from nephrology is a study in which the data from each participant consist of repeated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements and time to initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Joint models typically combine linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements and Cox models for censored survival outcomes. Our aim in this paper is to present an introductory tutorial on joint modelling methods, with a case study in nephrology.Methods: We describe the development of the joint modelling framework and compare the results with those obtained by the more widely used approaches of conducting separate analyses of the repeated measurements and survival times based on a linear mixed effects model and a Cox model, respectively. Our case study concerns a data set from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation Study (CRISIS). We also provide details of our open-source software implementation to allow others to replicate and/or modify our analysis.Results: The results for the conventional linear mixed effects model and the longitudinal component of the joint models were found to be similar. However, there were considerable differences between the results for the Cox model with time-varying covariate and the time-to-event component of the joint model. For example, the relationship between kidney function as measured by eGFR and the hazard for initiation of RRT was significantly underestimated by the Cox model that treats eGFR as a time-varying covariate, because the Cox model does not take measurement error in eGFR into account.Conclusions: Joint models should be preferred for simultaneous analyses of repeated measurement and survival data, especially when the former is measured with error and the association between the underlying error-free measurement process and the hazard for survival is of scientific interest.

KW - Chronic kidney disease

KW - cohort study

KW - epidemiology

KW - joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data

KW - measurement error

KW - medical statistics

KW - statistical software

U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyu262

DO - 10.1093/ije/dyu262

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25604450

VL - 44

SP - 334

EP - 344

JO - International Journal of Epidemiology

JF - International Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0300-5771

IS - 1

ER -