Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks. / Roulston, Mark S.; Kaivanto, Kim.
In: PLoS One, Vol. 19, No. 8, e0309164, 30.08.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Roulston MS, Kaivanto K. Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 30;19(8):e0309164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309164

Author

Roulston, Mark S. ; Kaivanto, Kim. / Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks. In: PLoS One. 2024 ; Vol. 19, No. 8.

Bibtex

@article{0e0fb208c5924158be916b0e52f748a4,
title = "Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks",
abstract = "Predicting future climate requires the integration of knowledge and expertise from a wide range of disciplines. Predictions must account for climate-change mitigation policies which may depend on climate predictions. This interdependency, or “circularity”, means that climate predictions must be conditioned on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Long-range forecasts also suffer from information asymmetry because users cannot use track records to judge the skill of providers. The problems of aggregation, circularity, and information asymmetry can be addressed using prediction markets with joint-outcome spaces, allowing simultaneous forecasts of GHG concentrations and temperature. The viability of prediction markets with highly granular, joint-outcome spaces was tested with markets for monthly UK rainfall and temperature. The experiments demonstrate these markets can aggregate the judgments of experts with relevant expertise, and suggest similarly structured markets, with longer horizons, could provide a mechanism to produce credible forecasts of climate-related risks for policy making, planning, and risk disclosure.",
author = "Roulston, {Mark S.} and Kim Kaivanto",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0309164",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint-outcome prediction markets for climate risks

AU - Roulston, Mark S.

AU - Kaivanto, Kim

PY - 2024/8/30

Y1 - 2024/8/30

N2 - Predicting future climate requires the integration of knowledge and expertise from a wide range of disciplines. Predictions must account for climate-change mitigation policies which may depend on climate predictions. This interdependency, or “circularity”, means that climate predictions must be conditioned on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Long-range forecasts also suffer from information asymmetry because users cannot use track records to judge the skill of providers. The problems of aggregation, circularity, and information asymmetry can be addressed using prediction markets with joint-outcome spaces, allowing simultaneous forecasts of GHG concentrations and temperature. The viability of prediction markets with highly granular, joint-outcome spaces was tested with markets for monthly UK rainfall and temperature. The experiments demonstrate these markets can aggregate the judgments of experts with relevant expertise, and suggest similarly structured markets, with longer horizons, could provide a mechanism to produce credible forecasts of climate-related risks for policy making, planning, and risk disclosure.

AB - Predicting future climate requires the integration of knowledge and expertise from a wide range of disciplines. Predictions must account for climate-change mitigation policies which may depend on climate predictions. This interdependency, or “circularity”, means that climate predictions must be conditioned on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Long-range forecasts also suffer from information asymmetry because users cannot use track records to judge the skill of providers. The problems of aggregation, circularity, and information asymmetry can be addressed using prediction markets with joint-outcome spaces, allowing simultaneous forecasts of GHG concentrations and temperature. The viability of prediction markets with highly granular, joint-outcome spaces was tested with markets for monthly UK rainfall and temperature. The experiments demonstrate these markets can aggregate the judgments of experts with relevant expertise, and suggest similarly structured markets, with longer horizons, could provide a mechanism to produce credible forecasts of climate-related risks for policy making, planning, and risk disclosure.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0309164

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0309164

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e0309164

ER -