Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Petropoulos 2018 judgmental-selection-forecasting

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 60, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/J.JOM.2018.05.005

    Accepted author manuscript, 938 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

  • Petropoulos 2018 Judgmental selection of forecasting models

    Final published version, 1.06 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models. / Petropoulos, Fotios; Kourentzes, Nikolaos; Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos et al.
In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 60, 2018, p. 34-46.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Petropoulos F, Kourentzes N, Nikolopoulos K, Siemsen E. Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models. Journal of Operations Management. 2018;60:34-46. Epub 2018 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005

Author

Petropoulos, Fotios ; Kourentzes, Nikolaos ; Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos et al. / Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models. In: Journal of Operations Management. 2018 ; Vol. 60. pp. 34-46.

Bibtex

@article{ffdeae120e0e446bbd448fd1ade80dc7,
title = "Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models",
abstract = "In this paper, we explored how judgment can be used to improve the selection of a forecasting model. We compared the performance of judgmental model selection against a standard algorithm based on information criteria. We also examined the efficacy of a judgmental model-build approach, in which experts were asked to decide on the existence of the structural components (trend and seasonality) of the time series instead of directly selecting a model from a choice set. Our behavioral study used data from almost 700 participants, including forecasting practitioners. The results from our experiment suggest that selecting models judgmentally results in performance that is on par, if not better, to that of algorithmic selection. Further, judgmental model selection helps to avoid the worst models more frequently compared to algorithmic selection. Finally, a simple combination of the statistical and judgmental selections and judgmental aggregation significantly outperform both statistical and judgmental selections.",
keywords = "Model selection, Behavioural operations, Decomposition, Combination",
author = "Fotios Petropoulos and Nikolaos Kourentzes and Konstantinos Nikolopoulos and Enno Siemsen",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 60, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/J.JOM.2018.05.005",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "34--46",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models

AU - Petropoulos, Fotios

AU - Kourentzes, Nikolaos

AU - Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos

AU - Siemsen, Enno

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Operations Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Operations Management, 60, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/J.JOM.2018.05.005

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this paper, we explored how judgment can be used to improve the selection of a forecasting model. We compared the performance of judgmental model selection against a standard algorithm based on information criteria. We also examined the efficacy of a judgmental model-build approach, in which experts were asked to decide on the existence of the structural components (trend and seasonality) of the time series instead of directly selecting a model from a choice set. Our behavioral study used data from almost 700 participants, including forecasting practitioners. The results from our experiment suggest that selecting models judgmentally results in performance that is on par, if not better, to that of algorithmic selection. Further, judgmental model selection helps to avoid the worst models more frequently compared to algorithmic selection. Finally, a simple combination of the statistical and judgmental selections and judgmental aggregation significantly outperform both statistical and judgmental selections.

AB - In this paper, we explored how judgment can be used to improve the selection of a forecasting model. We compared the performance of judgmental model selection against a standard algorithm based on information criteria. We also examined the efficacy of a judgmental model-build approach, in which experts were asked to decide on the existence of the structural components (trend and seasonality) of the time series instead of directly selecting a model from a choice set. Our behavioral study used data from almost 700 participants, including forecasting practitioners. The results from our experiment suggest that selecting models judgmentally results in performance that is on par, if not better, to that of algorithmic selection. Further, judgmental model selection helps to avoid the worst models more frequently compared to algorithmic selection. Finally, a simple combination of the statistical and judgmental selections and judgmental aggregation significantly outperform both statistical and judgmental selections.

KW - Model selection

KW - Behavioural operations

KW - Decomposition

KW - Combination

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 60

SP - 34

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

ER -