Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching c...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics. / Introna, L.
Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2003. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Introna, L 2003 'Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics' Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series, The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, Lancaster University.

APA

Introna, L. (2003). Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series). The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology.

Vancouver

Introna L. Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics. Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology. 2003. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Author

Introna, L. / Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics. Lancaster University : The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2003. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{ed12969fa45749488df03bea7f4c720d,
title = "Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics",
abstract = "Can we teach ethics, and if we can how should we do it? Do we want our students to know moral theory or act morally? This paper assumes that the objective of 'teaching ethics' is to cultivate the possibility for moral conduct in the everyday world of institutional life. As teachers we know how to teach moral theory but how do we encourage our students to act morally. To attempt an answer I will present some ideas from the work of Levinas and Derrida. With Levinas I will argue that ethics happens in the singularity of the face of the Other before me 'here and now'. Ethics matter in my everyday contact with the Other that confronts me and claims my response. But what about all other Others simultaneously present? What about justice for all other Others? With Levinas and Derrida I will attempt to articulate the notion of 'caring justice'. In caring justice I want to show how the demands of ethics (the singular) and the demands of justice (all other Others) can become the impossible possibility for a {"}justice where there is no distinction between those close and those far off, but in which there also remains the impossibility of passing by the closest.{"} Furthermore, I want to argue for the need of Aristotle's notion of ethics as a habit-caring justice as the cultivation of moral character by doing. Finally, to demonstrate what I mean I discuss a singular case of intellectual property right. In this 'case' I try to show how caring justice can help us not to teach ethics, but do it--almost",
author = "L Introna",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
series = "Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics

AU - Introna, L

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Can we teach ethics, and if we can how should we do it? Do we want our students to know moral theory or act morally? This paper assumes that the objective of 'teaching ethics' is to cultivate the possibility for moral conduct in the everyday world of institutional life. As teachers we know how to teach moral theory but how do we encourage our students to act morally. To attempt an answer I will present some ideas from the work of Levinas and Derrida. With Levinas I will argue that ethics happens in the singularity of the face of the Other before me 'here and now'. Ethics matter in my everyday contact with the Other that confronts me and claims my response. But what about all other Others simultaneously present? What about justice for all other Others? With Levinas and Derrida I will attempt to articulate the notion of 'caring justice'. In caring justice I want to show how the demands of ethics (the singular) and the demands of justice (all other Others) can become the impossible possibility for a "justice where there is no distinction between those close and those far off, but in which there also remains the impossibility of passing by the closest." Furthermore, I want to argue for the need of Aristotle's notion of ethics as a habit-caring justice as the cultivation of moral character by doing. Finally, to demonstrate what I mean I discuss a singular case of intellectual property right. In this 'case' I try to show how caring justice can help us not to teach ethics, but do it--almost

AB - Can we teach ethics, and if we can how should we do it? Do we want our students to know moral theory or act morally? This paper assumes that the objective of 'teaching ethics' is to cultivate the possibility for moral conduct in the everyday world of institutional life. As teachers we know how to teach moral theory but how do we encourage our students to act morally. To attempt an answer I will present some ideas from the work of Levinas and Derrida. With Levinas I will argue that ethics happens in the singularity of the face of the Other before me 'here and now'. Ethics matter in my everyday contact with the Other that confronts me and claims my response. But what about all other Others simultaneously present? What about justice for all other Others? With Levinas and Derrida I will attempt to articulate the notion of 'caring justice'. In caring justice I want to show how the demands of ethics (the singular) and the demands of justice (all other Others) can become the impossible possibility for a "justice where there is no distinction between those close and those far off, but in which there also remains the impossibility of passing by the closest." Furthermore, I want to argue for the need of Aristotle's notion of ethics as a habit-caring justice as the cultivation of moral character by doing. Finally, to demonstrate what I mean I discuss a singular case of intellectual property right. In this 'case' I try to show how caring justice can help us not to teach ethics, but do it--almost

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series

BT - Justice and Responsibility: on (not) teaching computer and information ethics

PB - The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology

CY - Lancaster University

ER -