Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project. / Ogwumike, Chris; Dawood, Huda; Ahmed, Tariq et al.
In: Environmental Sciences Proceedings, Vol. 11, No. 1, e23, 01.12.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Ogwumike, C, Dawood, H, Ahmed, T, Gudlaugsson, B & Dawood, N 2021, 'KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project', Environmental Sciences Proceedings, vol. 11, no. 1, e23. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021011023

APA

Ogwumike, C., Dawood, H., Ahmed, T., Gudlaugsson, B., & Dawood, N. (2021). KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 11(1), Article e23. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021011023

Vancouver

Ogwumike C, Dawood H, Ahmed T, Gudlaugsson B, Dawood N. KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):e23. doi: 10.3390/environsciproc2021011023

Author

Ogwumike, Chris ; Dawood, Huda ; Ahmed, Tariq et al. / KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance : A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project. In: Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{0dde331402634517bf2d12aa7f14d3b6,
title = "KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance: A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project",
abstract = "This paper presents an assessment of the impacts of the different tools implemented within the inteGRIDy project through the analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs) that appropriately reflect the technical and economic domains of the inteGRIDy thematic pillars, comprising demand response and battery storage systems. The evaluation is based on improvements brought about by individual components of the inteGRIDy-enabled smart solution across the Isle of Wight (IOW) pilot site. The analyses and the interpretation of findings for the pilot use case evaluation are presented. The results indicate that the smart solution implementation across the IOW pilot site resulted in achieving the inteGRIDy set objectives. Overall, a 93% reduction in energy consumption, equivalent to 643 kWh was achieved, via the M7 energy storage system and heat pumps developed as part of inteGRIDy solution. Additionally, the grid efficiency and demand flexibility contribution to the distribution network operator (DNO)-triggered DR services, based on a 10% increase/decrease in demand, resulted in stabilizing the grid efficiency.",
keywords = "key performance indicators, KPI evaluation, baseline, smart solution implementation, demand response, battery storage, energy storage system",
author = "Chris Ogwumike and Huda Dawood and Tariq Ahmed and Bjarnhedinn Gudlaugsson and Nashwan Dawood",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/environsciproc2021011023",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Environmental Sciences Proceedings",
issn = "2673-4931",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - KPI Evaluation Framework and Tools Performance

T2 - A Case Study from the inteGRIDy Project

AU - Ogwumike, Chris

AU - Dawood, Huda

AU - Ahmed, Tariq

AU - Gudlaugsson, Bjarnhedinn

AU - Dawood, Nashwan

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - This paper presents an assessment of the impacts of the different tools implemented within the inteGRIDy project through the analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs) that appropriately reflect the technical and economic domains of the inteGRIDy thematic pillars, comprising demand response and battery storage systems. The evaluation is based on improvements brought about by individual components of the inteGRIDy-enabled smart solution across the Isle of Wight (IOW) pilot site. The analyses and the interpretation of findings for the pilot use case evaluation are presented. The results indicate that the smart solution implementation across the IOW pilot site resulted in achieving the inteGRIDy set objectives. Overall, a 93% reduction in energy consumption, equivalent to 643 kWh was achieved, via the M7 energy storage system and heat pumps developed as part of inteGRIDy solution. Additionally, the grid efficiency and demand flexibility contribution to the distribution network operator (DNO)-triggered DR services, based on a 10% increase/decrease in demand, resulted in stabilizing the grid efficiency.

AB - This paper presents an assessment of the impacts of the different tools implemented within the inteGRIDy project through the analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs) that appropriately reflect the technical and economic domains of the inteGRIDy thematic pillars, comprising demand response and battery storage systems. The evaluation is based on improvements brought about by individual components of the inteGRIDy-enabled smart solution across the Isle of Wight (IOW) pilot site. The analyses and the interpretation of findings for the pilot use case evaluation are presented. The results indicate that the smart solution implementation across the IOW pilot site resulted in achieving the inteGRIDy set objectives. Overall, a 93% reduction in energy consumption, equivalent to 643 kWh was achieved, via the M7 energy storage system and heat pumps developed as part of inteGRIDy solution. Additionally, the grid efficiency and demand flexibility contribution to the distribution network operator (DNO)-triggered DR services, based on a 10% increase/decrease in demand, resulted in stabilizing the grid efficiency.

KW - key performance indicators

KW - KPI evaluation

KW - baseline

KW - smart solution implementation

KW - demand response

KW - battery storage

KW - energy storage system

U2 - 10.3390/environsciproc2021011023

DO - 10.3390/environsciproc2021011023

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - Environmental Sciences Proceedings

JF - Environmental Sciences Proceedings

SN - 2673-4931

IS - 1

M1 - e23

ER -