Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamie...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Clásico: un Ejemplo desde la Teoría de la Detección de Señales

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Clásico: un Ejemplo desde la Teoría de la Detección de Señales. / Muñiz-Diez, Clara; Alvarez, Beatriz; Loy, Ignacio.
In: Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.07.2015, p. 11-32.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Muñiz-Diez C, Alvarez B, Loy I. La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Clásico: un Ejemplo desde la Teoría de la Detección de Señales. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada. 2015 Jul 1;20(2):11-32. doi: 10.17811/rema.20.2.2015.11-32

Author

Muñiz-Diez, Clara ; Alvarez, Beatriz ; Loy, Ignacio. / La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Clásico : un Ejemplo desde la Teoría de la Detección de Señales. In: Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 11-32.

Bibtex

@article{bce735c9582749238dcc1be63b02c0a6,
title = "La Interacci{\'o}n entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Cl{\'a}sico: un Ejemplo desde la Teor{\'i}a de la Detecci{\'o}n de Se{\~n}ales",
abstract = "Classical conditioning allows relating the fundamental research in non-human animals with contingency assessment tasks in humans, given that animals judge the relationship between a conditioned stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus in a way akin to humans judge the relationship between a cue and an outcome. Classical conditioning has been traditionally explained by associative models, but these models have been demonstrated have some limitations. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) can be a more appropriate alternative. In the present experiment contingency assessment is analyzed in four groups of rats that were exposed to a tone that was always followed by food (100%), and a tone-click compound for which different contingencies of reinforcement were employed (100%, 66%, 33% and 0%). The general design was A+/ AX+. The group in which the compound was always reinforced (100%) showed augmentation and blocking. In contrast, second order conditioning and conditioned inhibition were observed when the compound contingency reinforcement was 0%. The results showed that these phenomena appeared in different moments of training for the mentioned groups, whereas groups with intermediate reinforcement (33% and 66%) showed intermediate results. Results are analyzed using associative learning methodologies and TDS techniques. Theoretical implications of applying SDT to associative learning are discussed.",
author = "Clara Mu{\~n}iz-Diez and Beatriz Alvarez and Ignacio Loy",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.17811/rema.20.2.2015.11-32",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "20",
pages = "11--32",
journal = "Revista Electr{\'o}nica de Metodolog{\'i}a Aplicada",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - La Interacción entre Claves en el Condicionamiento Clásico

T2 - un Ejemplo desde la Teoría de la Detección de Señales

AU - Muñiz-Diez, Clara

AU - Alvarez, Beatriz

AU - Loy, Ignacio

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Classical conditioning allows relating the fundamental research in non-human animals with contingency assessment tasks in humans, given that animals judge the relationship between a conditioned stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus in a way akin to humans judge the relationship between a cue and an outcome. Classical conditioning has been traditionally explained by associative models, but these models have been demonstrated have some limitations. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) can be a more appropriate alternative. In the present experiment contingency assessment is analyzed in four groups of rats that were exposed to a tone that was always followed by food (100%), and a tone-click compound for which different contingencies of reinforcement were employed (100%, 66%, 33% and 0%). The general design was A+/ AX+. The group in which the compound was always reinforced (100%) showed augmentation and blocking. In contrast, second order conditioning and conditioned inhibition were observed when the compound contingency reinforcement was 0%. The results showed that these phenomena appeared in different moments of training for the mentioned groups, whereas groups with intermediate reinforcement (33% and 66%) showed intermediate results. Results are analyzed using associative learning methodologies and TDS techniques. Theoretical implications of applying SDT to associative learning are discussed.

AB - Classical conditioning allows relating the fundamental research in non-human animals with contingency assessment tasks in humans, given that animals judge the relationship between a conditioned stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus in a way akin to humans judge the relationship between a cue and an outcome. Classical conditioning has been traditionally explained by associative models, but these models have been demonstrated have some limitations. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) can be a more appropriate alternative. In the present experiment contingency assessment is analyzed in four groups of rats that were exposed to a tone that was always followed by food (100%), and a tone-click compound for which different contingencies of reinforcement were employed (100%, 66%, 33% and 0%). The general design was A+/ AX+. The group in which the compound was always reinforced (100%) showed augmentation and blocking. In contrast, second order conditioning and conditioned inhibition were observed when the compound contingency reinforcement was 0%. The results showed that these phenomena appeared in different moments of training for the mentioned groups, whereas groups with intermediate reinforcement (33% and 66%) showed intermediate results. Results are analyzed using associative learning methodologies and TDS techniques. Theoretical implications of applying SDT to associative learning are discussed.

U2 - 10.17811/rema.20.2.2015.11-32

DO - 10.17811/rema.20.2.2015.11-32

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 11

EP - 32

JO - Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada

JF - Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada

IS - 2

ER -