Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Nahari, G. , Ashkenazi, T. , Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P. , Hershkowitz, I. , Masip, J. , Meijer, E. H., Nisin, Z. , Sarid, N. , Taylor, P. J., Verschuere, B. and Vrij, A. (2019), ‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Leg Crim Psychol, 24: 1-23. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12148 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12148/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Accepted author manuscript, 537 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Language of lies
T2 - Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research
AU - Nahari, Galit
AU - Ashkenazi, Tzachi
AU - Fisher, Ronald P.
AU - Granhag, Par Anders
AU - Hershkowitz, Irit
AU - Masip, Jaume
AU - Meijer, Ewout H.
AU - Nisin, Zvi
AU - Sarid, Nadav
AU - Taylor, Paul Jonathon
AU - Verschuere, Bruno
AU - Vrij, Aldert
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Nahari, G. , Ashkenazi, T. , Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P. , Hershkowitz, I. , Masip, J. , Meijer, E. H., Nisin, Z. , Sarid, N. , Taylor, P. J., Verschuere, B. and Vrij, A. (2019), ‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Leg Crim Psychol, 24: 1-23. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12148 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12148/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Since its introduction into the field of deception detection, the verbal channel has become a rapidly growing area of research. The basic assumption is that liars differ from truth tellers in their verbal behaviour, making it possible to classify them by inspecting their verbal accounts. However, as noted in conferences and in private communication between researchers, the field of verbal lie detection faces several challenges that merit focused attention. The first author therefore proposed a workshop with the mission of promoting solutions for urgent issues in the field. Nine researchers and three practitioners with experience in credibility assessments gathered for 3 days of discussion at Bar‐Ilan University (Israel) in the first international verbal lie detection workshop. The primary session of the workshop took place the morning of the first day. In this session, each of the participants had up to 10 min to deliver a brief message, using just one slide. Researchers were asked to answer the question: ‘In your view, what is the most urgent, unsolved question/issue in verbal lie detection?’ Similarly, practitioners were asked: ‘As a practitioner, what question/issue do you wish verbal lie detection research would address?’ The issues raised served as the basis for the discussions that were held throughout the workshop. The current paper first presents the urgent, unsolved issues raised by the workshop group members in the main session, followed by a message to researchers in the field, designed to deliver the insights, decisions, and conclusions resulting from the discussions.
AB - Since its introduction into the field of deception detection, the verbal channel has become a rapidly growing area of research. The basic assumption is that liars differ from truth tellers in their verbal behaviour, making it possible to classify them by inspecting their verbal accounts. However, as noted in conferences and in private communication between researchers, the field of verbal lie detection faces several challenges that merit focused attention. The first author therefore proposed a workshop with the mission of promoting solutions for urgent issues in the field. Nine researchers and three practitioners with experience in credibility assessments gathered for 3 days of discussion at Bar‐Ilan University (Israel) in the first international verbal lie detection workshop. The primary session of the workshop took place the morning of the first day. In this session, each of the participants had up to 10 min to deliver a brief message, using just one slide. Researchers were asked to answer the question: ‘In your view, what is the most urgent, unsolved question/issue in verbal lie detection?’ Similarly, practitioners were asked: ‘As a practitioner, what question/issue do you wish verbal lie detection research would address?’ The issues raised served as the basis for the discussions that were held throughout the workshop. The current paper first presents the urgent, unsolved issues raised by the workshop group members in the main session, followed by a message to researchers in the field, designed to deliver the insights, decisions, and conclusions resulting from the discussions.
KW - verbal lie detection
KW - detection deception
KW - verbal cues
KW - Criteria‐based Content Analysis
KW - reality monitoring
KW - Verifiability Approach
KW - Theory–Protocol–Procedure paradigm
KW - workshop proceedings
U2 - 10.1111/lcrp.12148
DO - 10.1111/lcrp.12148
M3 - Journal article
VL - 24
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology
JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology
SN - 1355-3259
IS - 1
ER -