Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments. / Macqueen, Susy; Collins, Luke; Brookes, Gavin et al.
In: Discourse Studies, 04.03.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Macqueen, S., Collins, L., Brookes, G., Demjén, Z., Semino, E., & Slade, D. (2024). Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments. Discourse Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231194845

Vancouver

Macqueen S, Collins L, Brookes G, Demjén Z, Semino E, Slade D. Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments. Discourse Studies. 2024 Mar 4. Epub 2024 Mar 4. doi: 10.1177/14614456231194845

Author

Macqueen, Susy ; Collins, Luke ; Brookes, Gavin et al. / Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments. In: Discourse Studies. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{1dc3698b6c884848a5bcba8684f65037,
title = "Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments",
abstract = "For patients, hospital emergency departments (EDs) are unfamiliar, institutional contexts involving high-stakes communication in heightened emotional circumstances. This study examines laughter, as one expression of emotion, in an existing 649,631-word corpus of naturally occurring clinician-patient interactions recorded in five Australian hospitals. A mixed methods approach revealed (1) the spread, frequency and producers of laughter, and (2) the functions of laughter in unfolding interactional contexts. First, a corpus analysis showed that laughter in the ED was most frequently produced by nurses and patients, but relatively infrequently by doctors. Secondly, two case studies comprising all the interactions of two patients for the whole duration of their ED visits were analysed in detail to explore the individuals{\textquoteright} contrasting patterns of laughter. The analysis revealed how laughter can be a cue to the affective dynamics of patient-clinician interactions about serious matters, for example, signalling difficult topics and managing anxiety in the ED context. Laughter, and any related humour, can indicate the achievement of mutuality, which is considered a cornerstone of genuine shared decision-making and patient participation in their own care. Therefore, the findings suggest that a sensitive responsiveness to patient-initiated laughter, and any associated humour, may promote patient-centred relationships in clinical interactions.",
keywords = "Anthropology, Communication, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Social Psychology",
author = "Susy Macqueen and Luke Collins and Gavin Brookes and Zs{\'o}fia Demj{\'e}n and Elena Semino and Diana Slade",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/14614456231194845",
language = "English",
journal = "Discourse Studies",
issn = "1461-4456",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laughter in Hospital Emergency Departments

AU - Macqueen, Susy

AU - Collins, Luke

AU - Brookes, Gavin

AU - Demjén, Zsófia

AU - Semino, Elena

AU - Slade, Diana

PY - 2024/3/4

Y1 - 2024/3/4

N2 - For patients, hospital emergency departments (EDs) are unfamiliar, institutional contexts involving high-stakes communication in heightened emotional circumstances. This study examines laughter, as one expression of emotion, in an existing 649,631-word corpus of naturally occurring clinician-patient interactions recorded in five Australian hospitals. A mixed methods approach revealed (1) the spread, frequency and producers of laughter, and (2) the functions of laughter in unfolding interactional contexts. First, a corpus analysis showed that laughter in the ED was most frequently produced by nurses and patients, but relatively infrequently by doctors. Secondly, two case studies comprising all the interactions of two patients for the whole duration of their ED visits were analysed in detail to explore the individuals’ contrasting patterns of laughter. The analysis revealed how laughter can be a cue to the affective dynamics of patient-clinician interactions about serious matters, for example, signalling difficult topics and managing anxiety in the ED context. Laughter, and any related humour, can indicate the achievement of mutuality, which is considered a cornerstone of genuine shared decision-making and patient participation in their own care. Therefore, the findings suggest that a sensitive responsiveness to patient-initiated laughter, and any associated humour, may promote patient-centred relationships in clinical interactions.

AB - For patients, hospital emergency departments (EDs) are unfamiliar, institutional contexts involving high-stakes communication in heightened emotional circumstances. This study examines laughter, as one expression of emotion, in an existing 649,631-word corpus of naturally occurring clinician-patient interactions recorded in five Australian hospitals. A mixed methods approach revealed (1) the spread, frequency and producers of laughter, and (2) the functions of laughter in unfolding interactional contexts. First, a corpus analysis showed that laughter in the ED was most frequently produced by nurses and patients, but relatively infrequently by doctors. Secondly, two case studies comprising all the interactions of two patients for the whole duration of their ED visits were analysed in detail to explore the individuals’ contrasting patterns of laughter. The analysis revealed how laughter can be a cue to the affective dynamics of patient-clinician interactions about serious matters, for example, signalling difficult topics and managing anxiety in the ED context. Laughter, and any related humour, can indicate the achievement of mutuality, which is considered a cornerstone of genuine shared decision-making and patient participation in their own care. Therefore, the findings suggest that a sensitive responsiveness to patient-initiated laughter, and any associated humour, may promote patient-centred relationships in clinical interactions.

KW - Anthropology

KW - Communication

KW - Language and Linguistics

KW - Linguistics and Language

KW - Social Psychology

U2 - 10.1177/14614456231194845

DO - 10.1177/14614456231194845

M3 - Journal article

JO - Discourse Studies

JF - Discourse Studies

SN - 1461-4456

ER -