Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Law, Law-Consciousness and Lawyers as Constitut...

Electronic data

  • Sugarman-Law, Law-Consciousness and Lawyers as Constitutive of Early Modern England

    Submitted manuscript, 905 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • SUGARMAN- LAW, LAW-CONSCIOUSNESS AND LAWYERS AS CONSTITUTIVE OF EARLY MODERN ENGLAND 18.1.21

    Rights statement: This material has been published in Law, Lawyers and Litigants in Early Modern England. Essays in Memory of Christopher W. Brooks edited by Michael Lobban, Joanne Begiato and Adrian Green https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/legal-history/law-lawyers-and-litigants-early-modern-england-essays-memory-christopher-w-brooks?format=HB. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press 2019

    Accepted author manuscript, 402 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

Law, Law-Consciousness and Lawyers as Constitutive of Early Modern England: Christopher W. Brooks’s Singular Journey

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published
NullPointerException

Abstract

During the last half-century, Christopher W. Brooks (1948–2014) established
himself as the foremost historian of law in early modern English
society. Through his scholarship, his teaching, and the generations of
students he advised and supervised, and as a friend and colleague, Brooks
exercised, from the early 1990s onwards, an increasingly significant influence
on writing about early modern English history. He was the leading
exponent of a history of earlymodern England that transcended the boundaries
of social, political and legal history, and which placed law and lawyers
centre stage. In doing so, he challenged major premises of the dominant
vision of law-in-history in writing about English history. This chapter brings
a critical, if friendly, eye to Brooks’s work, focusing on how Brooks beat his
own path through the methodological thickets to create a distinctive vision
of law in history, and on the strengths and weaknesses of that vision.

Bibliographic note

This material has been published in Law, Lawyers and Litigants in Early Modern England. Essays in Memory of Christopher W. Brooks edited by Michael Lobban, Joanne Begiato and Adrian Green https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/legal-history/law-lawyers-and-litigants-early-modern-england-essays-memory-christopher-w-brooks?format=HB. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press 2019