Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Le paradoxe du stigmate

Electronic data

  • Le_paradoxe_du_stigmate_version_finale

    Rights statement: This article is under copyright and that the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.

    Accepted author manuscript, 110 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Le paradoxe du stigmate: ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Le paradoxe du stigmate : ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest. / Baron, Isabelle.

In: Cahiers Naturalistes, Vol. 89, No. 61e année, 01.09.2015, p. 169-195.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Baron, I 2015, 'Le paradoxe du stigmate: ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest', Cahiers Naturalistes, vol. 89, no. 61e année, pp. 169-195.

APA

Vancouver

Baron I. Le paradoxe du stigmate: ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest. Cahiers Naturalistes. 2015 Sep 1;89(61e année):169-195.

Author

Baron, Isabelle. / Le paradoxe du stigmate : ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest. In: Cahiers Naturalistes. 2015 ; Vol. 89, No. 61e année. pp. 169-195.

Bibtex

@article{cce97ff760844cb289590844f5543995,
title = "Le paradoxe du stigmate: ambiguit{\'e} et d{\'e}rives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest",
abstract = "In this paper, I examine the paradox created by the empiric and scientific epistemology of the nineteenth century, which, far from reaffirming the ideals of the Third Republic, undermines their foundations, systematically calling them into question. Civilisation, Science and economic progress no longer stand as a bulwark against social and physical pathologies. Indeed, they become a catalyst for these pathologies through theories such as atavism and heredity which promote nature{\textquoteright}s determinism, thus establishing almost unsurmountable limits as to the future potential of lesser social groups via education. Through the concept of stigma, developed by the American sociologist Erwing Goffman, I will illustrate the ambiguities and the consequences of this paradox and its associated discursive shifts in Jean-Louis Dubut de Laforest{\textquoteright}s les Derniers Scandales de Paris.",
keywords = "naturalisme, Dubut de Laforest, Carnivalesque",
author = "Isabelle Baron",
note = "Date of Acceptance (informal): 21/02/2014 This article is under copyright and that the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "1",
language = "French",
volume = "89",
pages = "169--195",
journal = "Cahiers Naturalistes",
issn = "0008-0365",
publisher = "Societe Litteraire des Amis d'Emile Zola",
number = "61e ann{\'e}e",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Le paradoxe du stigmate

T2 - ambiguité et dérives naturalistes chez Dubut de Laforest

AU - Baron, Isabelle

N1 - Date of Acceptance (informal): 21/02/2014 This article is under copyright and that the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - In this paper, I examine the paradox created by the empiric and scientific epistemology of the nineteenth century, which, far from reaffirming the ideals of the Third Republic, undermines their foundations, systematically calling them into question. Civilisation, Science and economic progress no longer stand as a bulwark against social and physical pathologies. Indeed, they become a catalyst for these pathologies through theories such as atavism and heredity which promote nature’s determinism, thus establishing almost unsurmountable limits as to the future potential of lesser social groups via education. Through the concept of stigma, developed by the American sociologist Erwing Goffman, I will illustrate the ambiguities and the consequences of this paradox and its associated discursive shifts in Jean-Louis Dubut de Laforest’s les Derniers Scandales de Paris.

AB - In this paper, I examine the paradox created by the empiric and scientific epistemology of the nineteenth century, which, far from reaffirming the ideals of the Third Republic, undermines their foundations, systematically calling them into question. Civilisation, Science and economic progress no longer stand as a bulwark against social and physical pathologies. Indeed, they become a catalyst for these pathologies through theories such as atavism and heredity which promote nature’s determinism, thus establishing almost unsurmountable limits as to the future potential of lesser social groups via education. Through the concept of stigma, developed by the American sociologist Erwing Goffman, I will illustrate the ambiguities and the consequences of this paradox and its associated discursive shifts in Jean-Louis Dubut de Laforest’s les Derniers Scandales de Paris.

KW - naturalisme

KW - Dubut de Laforest

KW - Carnivalesque

M3 - Journal article

VL - 89

SP - 169

EP - 195

JO - Cahiers Naturalistes

JF - Cahiers Naturalistes

SN - 0008-0365

IS - 61e année

ER -